Библиотека первоисточников · исследовательский корпус первичных текстов

2.3. Global level of examination

“About the current moment” №8(80), August 2008. Signs of Boundary Between Epochs · перевод (English) · раздел 4 из 7

Перевод исходного произведения; точность перевода оценивается отдельно.

2.3. Global level of examination

Without support from USA post-Soviet Georgia would disintegrated long ago under influence of its internal algorithmic. But such variant doesn’t suit to USA now and before. Also the USA are not suited with preservation of territorial integrity of Russia and moreover - with reintegration processes on former-USSR territory; under certain conditions stipulated mostly by Russia 's policy, some nations which never were members of Russian empire or the USSR, from both Europe and Asia may join in these processes.

From the beginning of 2nd half of XX century this is real political practice substantiated by USA ' official documents. One of these documents - NSC 20/1 1948 “ U.S. objectives with respect to Russia ” [13]:

«…we are entirely within our own rights, and need feel no sense of guilt, in working for the destruction of concepts inconsistent with world peace and stability and for their replacement by ones of tolerance and international collaboration. It is not our business to calculate the internal developments to which the adoption of such concepts might lead in another country, nor need we feel that we have any responsibility for those developments.… (Printed in bold while quoting by us: this - is declaration of amorality in US' policy, which [i.e. amorality] is not inexcusable for true democracy).»

Till today the U.S. politics moves in channel of this 60-year old directive and subsequent documents, which adapt its principles to changing historical conditions. This is the course to complete world dominion of the USA, grounds for which found its expression in the book by Zbignev Brzezinski “The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives” [14].

According to global policy principles, which USA executes after 1945, for USA bosses Georgia is, first of all, the position for “rapid deployment forces” and elements of USA global military infrastructure deployment. But USA can’t use this region, until there are Russian troops on Georgian territory, inherited from the USSR.

In this part petty-parasitic interests of Georgian “elite” on suppression of Georgian national minorities “separatism” and Russian peacemaking contingent withdrawal out of Georgia's borders coincide with USA' interests.

“Blitzkrieg”, to which USA supposedly trained Georgian Army, hasn’t achieved its goals ((1) to change administrations in “insurgent regions”; or (2) to involve Russia into a protracted war). I.e. USA enticed Saakashvili to the first variant, but really prepared the second variant.

Nor the first, nor the second really happened.

On the one hand it displeases USA and stirs up Saakashvili’s embarrassment close to psychic frustration, and on the other hand, military-political Russia’s victory provokes enthusiasm of those society sections both in Russia and abroad, which, if put it mildly, have little liking of the USA for its politics mendacity and dissimulation.

Saakashvili himself and his regime at present time are exclusively Georgian internal problems depended on that post-Soviet Georgia has no true sovereignty; and there are Georgians who have to solve these problems, but not at the expense of Ossetians, Abkhazians or Russians.

Moreover, there is an opinion that USA intended to use Georgian territory in planned aggression against Iran. So Saakashvili’s “spontaneous activity” in assault to South Ossetia (which provoked Russian Army involving in conflict) frustrated this plan and caused hysterics of Bush administration representatives [15]. In this case, not American military head-quarters’ but their bosses’ “left hand doesn’t know what their right hand is doing”:

· some of them design war on Iran with Georgian participation and with Ukrainian air defence subunits for defending objectives at Georgian territory,

· and others, in order to ruin this war (using “fighting fire on fire” method) forestally organize Georgia military venture at S. Ossetia, thus after armed conflict with Russia Georgia becomes unsuitable for using in USA war against Iran.