3. Why Russia is «the Empire of Evil» for the West
“About the current moment” №2(134), April 2018. Globalization as a «hybrid war» and the mission of Russia in it · перевод (English) · раздел 5 из 6
Перевод исходного произведения; точность перевода оценивается отдельно.
3. Why Russia is «the Empire of Evil» for the West
«Many years ago Kennan (American ambassador in the USSR George Kennan, famous as «Cold War Architect» — ref. Vzglyad), in fact, said that American-Russian relations had structural problems. What is interesting, at the end of the cold war everyone was saying: “Oh Kennan, you are a genius!” But later everyone forgot the other thing he said: “The problem is not in the fact that they are communists, but that they are Russians”. Aha, they are no longer communists and the relations are just fine!», — added the professor[12] with irony. (American professor: We will not get on with Moscow because they are Russians)[13].
That was said crystal clear:
We are «the Empire of Evil» for them because we are Russians[14], though the features of being Russian were not defined by the American political expert.
And this circumstance makes us define the major differences that characterize the essence of the regional civilizations of the West and that of Russia.
All is pretty simple with the West. The West is completely enslaved by the Biblical project which is aimed at establishing anonymous and complete supremacy in the name of God but without the God. The tools of its realization are the following:
● transnational Judaic monopoly on the usury as a tool of buying out the world with all its inhabitants and property, Commanded in the Old Testament;
● the New Testament silence on the ways of usury eradication and pseudo Christian commandment to tolerate all that happens with the faith in the good requital after the Day of Judgement for injustice suffered on Earth;
● the cult of the myth of intellectual superiority of judaic jews over the rest of the world and corporately managed control of jewish diaspores and masonry over civil institutions of all the Western states such as science, education, mass media, art and entertainment.
These three postulates refer to the time when the Old Testament-talmudic and the New Testament pseudo-Christian teachings were fundamental for the culture of the Western countries, as well as the subsequent epoch of social-bourgeois liberalism when all three postulates of historical biblical project were ensured by historically developed physchodynamics and established legislation of the enslaved societies: laws protect interests of «usury collective farms» — the banks, laws in many countries qualify any negative reference in regard of Judaic jews as xenophobia and antisemitism, whereas xenophobic and racist declarations of Judaic members of diaspora about their superiority over inferior non-jews and non-Judaic humanity is left without juridical consequences.
The essence of life in this regional civilization is consumer well-being and indulging in physical pleasures. That should be provided by: 1) private enterprise, 2) the principle «everyone pays for himself» and associated lust for profit at any cost, 3) the state regulation of internal social relations through civil law.
The situation in Russia is more complicated. In 1866, F.I.Tyutchev noticed: «Who would grasp Russia with the mind? / For her, no yardstick was created: / Her soul is of a special kind, / — By faith alone appreciated». Reading these lines we have to understand that F.I.Tyutchev himself had pan- European education, in other words, he possessed «Pan-European yardstick» and was a carrier of «pan-European standard of life perception». Since his time the pan-European type of education including the field of humanitarian and social sciences in Russia became not only general but in fact ultimately obligatory. But many of its carriers are fools compared with Tyutchev because they are convinced that «pan-European yardstick» («the values common to all mankind» in contemporary terms) can be used to measure everything including Russia, China, India and the world of Islam. Though the population of the Western states is far from being «all mankind» it is them who try to make all of their own standards including the standards of life perception non-alternatively true for all humanity.
That is why it is impossible to understand the essence of Russia, not to mention global issues involving humankind, all peoples, through the courses of the Arts and Social Sciences imitating Western educational model; moreover, most of the global-scale problems result from the fact that the majority of peoples live under the pressure of the Western interpretation of humanities and it doesn't even occur to them to create an alternative one[15].
But in order to understand the so-called «Russian specificity» one needs to go beyond limitations imposed by the standard of Western world outlook and realize the following.
Life of the global civilization is the process that implies interaction (including cultural exchange) of several regional civilizations, which are living their own lives following either the way of development or degradation. However peculiarity of any regional civilization lies not only in its typical lifestyle, which can be clearly observed from outside. The peculiarities described by travellers and analysts do not represent the key characteristic of a given civilization. A core that substantiates any regional civilization is made of its ideals that have been cherished for centuries by people of that civilization even though their real way of life may be far from complying with ideals beared by it[16]. Preservation of these ideals and passing them over as the main value to the generations to come is affected by those who represent its genetic core[17] — its peoples[18]. And while the genetic core is reproduced, while it stores and transmits the characteristic ideals of the civilization from generation to generation, then the civilization lives on and retains a potential ability to make its ideals come true.
Russia is one of the regional civilizations. It differs from the rest of the planet's civilizations in that it is within the borders of one state shared by numerous peoples. Contrary to Russia most of the other states belong to one of regional civilizations.
The major ideal specifying Russia as a multinational civilization is its feeling of fairness of a transcendental order. The name of the country chosen by Russians themselves — Sacred Rus' — thus reflects their target.
However the notion of «fairness» [«spravedlivost» in Russian] can hardly be determined using the Western terminology and it has not been codified by the Western jurisprudence for a number of reasons which are intertwined and interdependent:
● firstly, there exists an ideal of the highest fairness which everyone should become aware of, then the society should progressively develop for attaining it[19],
● and secondly, there is historically transitory understanding of fairness, which is conditioned by:
• presently existing historically conditioned quality of life in the society, including its inherent vices,
• historically shaped world outlook in a society,
• striving of a society to the ideal of fairness of the transcendental order as it is understood in a specific historical period.
Variability of the ideal of transcendental fairness during the life span of the society and qualifying as historically shaped injustice what once was considered to be an ideal of fairness make it impossible to legally codify «fairness the Russian way» as a term persistent in continuity of generations.
One of the aspects of fairness the Russian way is inexistence of parasitism in general and of parasitism that is organized as a system — i.e. exploiting of man by man — in particular.
It's obvious that the West cannot agree with such understanding of fairness, as the basis of its culture rests on parasitism in general and on parasitism as a system organized in global scale, that is on usury, in particular.
That is why Russia rejects any kind of unfairness intruding it from outside (rejection is a matter of time needed for realizing of this or that practice as being unfair with eradication of it to follow). Juridical laws are accepted by the Russian society only if they are on the same page with society's development and its ultimate goal to effect transcendental fairness in the world.
Well-being based on consuming, pleasures for pleasure sake are of no value in itself and are senseless if unfairness reigns: it can be seen from epic heritage of peoples living in the expanse of Russia. All those who belong to the genetic core of multinational Russian civilization assimilate this approach, though lots of life aspects or even entire life of those who do not make this core may contradict to the Russian civilization's ideal — its essence. And since the majority of people do not represent the civilization's genetic core they may live differently and in most cases they do. And this difference with the civilizational code manifested in daily life of some people reaches such extent that they deny Russia's civilizational ideals by every action in their life, makes the ground which allows supporters of the biblical eurocentrism to arrive at two diametrically opposite conclusions, both of them being wrong (in their own way):
● Russia is a European power[20], since most of its people are of Christian Orthodox faith;
● Russia is populated with tribes of wild people, who are not able to adopt the «civilized» — i.e. European, Western — lifestyle, that is why the area of Russia must be cleaned from wild population, as those Russians are hopeless, one cannot change them. But since these savages are armed and their armament is as powerful, and occasionally even more powerful than that of the «civilized people», then the «Russian savages» represent not only the «empire of evil» but they are «the embodied evil of the world».
Another difference between the West and Russia is that:
● The West, if not globally then in its area, realized its civilizational ideals (consumerists' wellbeing, enjoying pleasures, which must be sustained by: 1) individual entrepreneurs' initiative, 2) principle «everyone pays for himself», 3) state regulation of social relations on the basis of complying with laws); but since this result has been attained contrary to the objective trends guiding human personal life and their associations, then the West will have to face the «Universe 25»[21] mode of existence, i.e. its population is doomed to extinction as a biological species or due to cultural degradation unless the West stops to profess its «values» and reconsider them being ultimately correct.
● Russia has started to recognize its civilizational ideals by the second quarter of the XIX century[22] and by the end of the XX century has expressed them in its own humanitarian-social science known as the Concept of Societal Safety (CSS)[23], which provides an opportunity to bring our ancient civilizational ideals to life in the course of Humane globalization project’s implementation.
I.e. the future is ours, and the question is how it can be realized in a good way for all the humanity. For this purpose let us specify the terms «mental Trotskyism» and «Bolshevism».
Trotskyism is not just a variety of Marxism, not at all. Trotskyism is a psychic phenomena, i.e. it is an expression of individual psyche characteristics. Trotskyism as a sincere personal expression of well-meaning by its adherents is characterized by the conflict between individual consciousness and unconsciousness, both personal and collective, generated by all Trotskyists in their entirety. And in this conflict the collective unconsciousness triumphs by suppressing individually realized well-meaning with a complex of overall activities.
This is a psychic peculiarity of those who managed to get into Trotskyism, but not a characteristic of this or that ideology. Trotskyist’s type of psyche can be accompanied by any ideology. And due to this — pure psychic — reason equal relationship with Trotskyism and Trotskyists personally in intellectual discussions, arguments and counter arguments are vain and dangerous for those who consider it as one of the ideologies or don’t realize its real UNDER-ideological defective-mental base, not depending on the ideology that a mental Trotskyist adheres and which may honestly change several times during his lifetime.
Intellect, to which interlocutor appeals during discussion aiming to reason his opponent or to find the truth based on which previous problems in relationship can be solved, is just one of the psyche components. But psyche in general (in case of its Trotskyist type) doesn’t allow intellectual analysis of information as it may change one of the separate ideological doctrines to which this or that mental Trotskyist belongs.
This psychic characteristics[24] inherent to many individuals is historically a much older phenomenon than Marxist Trotskyism in the communist movement of the XX century. To define this psychic peculiarity, people in the past found no better words than «obsession» or «schizophrenia». In the epoch of materialistic ideology words for this phenomena that can express the essence of this psyche type’s inferiority disappeared and it has been named again, not in substance, but by pseudonim of one of the brightest representatives of Trotskyism in communist movement of the XX century.
Trotskyism in substance is a schizophrenic, aggressive, politically active psyche which can appeal to any ideology or social doctrine.
Initiated leaders of mental Trotskyists have been practising exhortations to respect democratic standards — its formal procedures and legitimacy which hide mafia organization of Trotskyists-leaders — manipulating the crowd involved in public democratic procedures in recent centuries. It was peculiar for both L.D.Trotskiy’s and his companions’ activity and for propagandists of bourgeois liberalism as well:
● the main accusation of J.V.Stalin and Bolsheviks by L.D.Trotskiy and co is the suppression of inner-party democracy and discussions, although Trotskyists themselves did not disdain murders of their political opponents (including the ones through the special services under their control);
● the main accusation from liberals (including claims to J.V.Stalin and Bolsheviks) is non-observance of «democracy standards» and violation of «human rights», although false democracy of the Western model is really ineffective due to two reasons:
• incompetence of the electorate, unable to foresee consequences of their choice;
• control of all spheres of the society's life by the Masonic mafia dictatorship, which does not disdain either political assassinations of the displeased (Lincoln, Kennedy in particular), or manipulating the electorate, ignorant and incapable of thinking.
This is why bourgeois liberalism, under power of which the West lives and which has been trying to control Russia since 1991, is one of the mental Trotskyism currents, brightly expressed in both political behaviour of US neocons and position of Elizaveta Georgievna’s government in regards to Russia after B.N.Yeltsin stopped being «figure-head president» in the new Western colony named «democratic Russian Federation».
Bolshevism, as the CPSU[25] history teaches, arose in 1903 at the Second Congress of the RSDLP[26] as one of the party fractions. As its opponents asserted, the Bolsheviks never represented the real majority of the Marxist party till 1917, and therefore their opponents always objected to their endonym during those years. But such an opinion stemmed from a misunderstanding of the Bolshevism essence by the promiscuous Mensheviks.
Bolshevism is not a Russian variety of Marxism and not a party affiliation. The Bolshevism essence is not a numerical superiority of adherents of some ideas over adherents of other ideas and thoughtless crowd. It is something different: a sincere desire to express and realize the ideals of that "transcendental fairness", including long-term strategic interests of the working majority, who want no one to parasitize on their work and life. In other words, historically, in every epoch, the essence of Bolshevism is an active support of the transitional process from the historically formed crowd-"elitism"[27] to the multinational humanity on the future era Earth.
Without understanding of these essence differences of Bolshevism and mental Trotskyism, an adequate understanding of history and political perspectives is impossible. According to such understanding of the Bolshevism essence, the Bolshevism had existed and acted long before appearance of Marxism, the RSDLP (b), VKP (b) and the words «Bolshevik» and «Bolshevism». Disappearing of these words from the political lexicon after the XIX Congress of the CPSU (B.) — the CPSU, after defection of the party-Soviet «elite» from the civilizational ideals of Russia and its active policy of surrendering the USSR to the West, after building an «elitist» corporation, pro-Western statehood in the post-Soviet Russia, nothing has changed: Bolshevism used to be inherent to the genetic core of the Russian multinational regional civilization in antiquity, and it continues to be inherent now, not depending on how often this word is used or whether it is going to be replaced by some other word in future - more accurately expressing the essence of this phenomenon in the new historical conditions.
Marxism was originally a pseudo-scientific secular version of the biblical project of enslaving humanity and was supposed to solve problems caused by society’s life on the basis of liberal-market economic model, namely:
● class antagonisms;
● consumerism race, which processes natural and human resources for nothing and results in the destruction of biosphere and humanity.
The bait for future victims is the promise of freedom, justice, eradication of exploitation of man by man under Socialism-Communism. The point though is that the power over societies and humanity as a whole should remain in the hands of mafia of enlightened, because epistemology of the dialectical materialism (as the first priority of generalized means of social governance/weapons[28]) is inconsistent with either Life in general, or modus operandi of human senses and psyche; and Political Economy of «Mraksism»[29] (the study on economic activities) is inconsistent in terms of metrology, therefore it can’t be associated with either accounting on the level of microeconomics, or state statistics as part of macroeconomics.
Although it was Russia, that demonstrated the highest demand for Marxism, it would be wrong to say that Satanist Marx together with Russophobe Engels intended specifically anti-Russian project. Originally, Marxism was to the same extent anti-Russian as anti-Chinese or anti-German. It was anti-human in general with no regard for nationality. But Russia took Marxism in two ways:
● firstly, the genetic core of Russian peoples took the promise of socialism-communism for truth because of the socialism-communism’s declared moral and ethics (like freedom, no exploitation of man by man, same ethics for all people with no regard to ancestry, nationality or class position); while Marxism’s lack of scientific and methodological support for the processes of social changes and organization of life of communist society was not recognized or realized;
● secondly, since the Time of Trouble (if not earlier) Russia had «elite» subcultures, whose essence was to give up their own creativity and imitate the «advanced West»[30] in the attempts to solve various problems in their own Fatherland.
Those with the first approach became Bolsheviks, for whom «Marxism is not a dogma, but a guide for action», and the action was building real socialism as a way to implement civilizational ideals of the regional civilization Russia. And those with the second approach became «true Marxists» — the Trotskyists. This symbiosis of Bolsheviks and Trotskyists first took power in its hands in 1917 and started building the USSR. And then the conflict arose between them: whether the socialism in the USSR was a cover-up on the tyranny of intraparty mafia or the socialism in the USSR meant the actual power of people and its freedom?
This was a multifaceted conflict: on its fleeting public side, the Bolsheviks led by J.V.Stalin defeated Trotskyists in the party and in the state by 1930. In this conflict, J.V.Stalin demonstrated to the unideaed bureaucracy, that he was the authority, and bureaucracy accepted it, while common people supported the Bolshevik-bureaucratic regime (also being the symbiosis of two powers). L.D.Trotsky drew on politicking ill-bred soldiers (like M.N.Tukhachevsky) in the army and intelligence services, and on liberal community largely consisting of «soft scientists» (meaning those who got unnatural liberal education instead of natural-scientific) and on artistic creative individuals (like today's Kirill Serebrennikov[31]). Obviously, the fighting capability of bureaucracy was higher than that of politicking ill-bred soldiers and speechifiers, the reason why true Marxist-Trotskyists lost. Then the Bolsheviks, by affecting the unideaed bureaucracy, started developing culture in which the personality development would provide sustainability for the Constitution of the USSR of 1936[32]. However, this process was not completed. It was hampered by the Second World War, and later by the murders of J.V.Stalin and L.P.Beria and by bureaucracy becoming parasitic social class. As a result, the USSR since 1950s got under the authority of the new generation of Trotskyists, who ultimately lost Marxism’s idealism and hooked up with their foreign analogues — psycho-Trotskyists with liberal doctrine of the leading Western states. As a result of their united efforts and with the complicity of the population, the USSR ceased to exist.
Period of Russian history from the Belavezha collusion[33] of alcoholics up to the current moment is a period, in which:
● apparent dominant element is the bourgeois liberal mafia trying to wipe out russians by «peaceful means» (means of «hybrid wars»), dismantle and colonize Russia while controlling the government bodies, mass media, finance and economics through own periphery of domestic liberal idiots and deliberately unideaed hireling opportunists with kulak-bandit mindset who have infiltrated many key positions;
● a process, controlled by virtual structure[34], of re-establishing full sovereignty by Russian peoples visibly resulting in three things:
• lack of support for liberals in people,
• increase in statistics of positive perception of J.V.Stalin and L.P.Beria and of the epoch they worked in, by new generations,
• common people expecting that V.V.Putin will continue in the footsteps of Stalin’s Bolshevism and will cleanse the country of liberalism and psycho-Trotskyism.
However, the confrontation between Marxist-psycho-Trotskyists and Bolsheviks during Stalin’s times and the confrontation between bourgeois-liberal-psycho-Trotskyists and genetic core of peoples of the Russian civilization (today’s nameless Bolsheviks), affects the interests of the сurators of biblical project for enslaving humanity in the same manner.
In other words, it's not about the West — it’s curators, public politicians, journalists, people of art including all kinds of freedom-loving faggots — are unhappy with Russia having voted for V.V.Putin on presidential elections, to who’s name and actions these Western curators attribute not only the loss of their conquests of 1985-1999, but the expectations of new losses of former achievements in solving the «Russian matter».
It’s about this psycho-dynamical process, controlled by virtual structure, of resumption of Russian people’s autocracy in line with the Kingdom of God on Earth, with which the curators of the West don’t know what to do. And if the former «threat of Bolshevism expansion throughout the world», as agreed by liberal-psycho-Trotskyists of the West, was associated with the personality of J.V.Stalin, they shouldn’t equate the nowadays «world evil» to the personalities of V.V.Putin and his «pocket oligarchs», because the fact that the leading western countries are entering the algorythmics of the «Universe 25» — the algorythmics of self-destruction of European indigenous population and US post-Indian population — is an «achievement» of western politicians themselves, accomplished without any «intrigues of Moscow»[35].
But most people both in the West and in Russia don’t understand current situation in the world. Why has this conflict between the West and Russia exacerbated so much? But this misunderstanding is a result of what’s said in the epigraph.
Nonetheless, the conflict between the West’s psycho-Trotskyism and Russia’s Bolshevism has escalated to the next level and has become global. And it is this very conflict between degradation and focus on development, that is shaping the future of humanity.
Internal Predictor of the USSR
4 — 7 april 2018