2.4.3. Bible - slave’s shackles
“About the current moment” №11(83), November 2008. Bureaucratic despair in Russia and global project “Obama” · перевод (English) · раздел 12 из 13
Перевод исходного произведения; точность перевода оценивается отдельно.
2.4.3. Bible - slave’s shackles
B. Obama Characterizes America:
«… our law is by definition a codification of morality, much of it grounded in Judeo-Christian tradition.” (p.218)
When describing his conversation with Senator Byrd (the oldest member of U.S. Senate and is though to be freemason), Barack Obama quotes him:
“So few people read the Constitution today,” Senator Byrd said, pulling out his copy from this breast pocket. “I’ve always said, this document and the Holy Bible, they’ve been all the guidance I need.” (p.100)
Barack Obama is a professional lawyer, and although he notices massive incompetence in practical solving of concrete problems by many professional lawyers and political scientists, he still doesn’t go into investigation of the reasons for this incompetence, that is programmed by the own character of historically formed legislative and political education.
Many professional lawyers are incapable of understanding the following:
· Any legislation is in essence a manifestation of an algorithmic of self-ruling of society and of state operating in the following concept - ruling ALWAYS assumes a conceptual certainty: legislation is written according to a given concept. Legislation’s objectives are: 1) provision of standard ruling according to this concept; 2) resolution of its internal conflicts; 3) it’s self-protection from ruling according to other concepts
· Conceptual ambiguity shows in the life of society as a controversy of its legislation, when different laws on the same subject give different solutions; as well as the flaws of law-executing practice, executed by the principle that the law can be used in many different ways based on the different wording and convenient precedent
Besides, conceptual uncertainty (as well as certainty) shows though state symbols. State symbols are a serious business, that should be taken seriously. Has anyone thought: Why in 1991 new regime changed soviet symbols for the symbols of Russian monarchy - two-headed eagle? The fact that change of symbols on its own and its procedure were not impromptu but thoroughly planned at least in Gorbachev’s times, if not earlier, says in the highest levels of soviet political hierarchy there were people powerful enough to sentence UUSR statehood to liquidation, ignoring public opinion (referendum). This group knew very well the history of Rome and Byzantine and must have had an understanding that two-headed eagle, being a symbol of conceptual uncertainty of the ruling, has destroyed not only Empire of Rome but also Roman dynasty of Russian Emperors. Did they lack in creativity and imagination to come up with a new heraldic, or did they knowingly started the algorithm of “kingdom divided in itself” in order to continue collapse of USSR with the fall of Russia? And as it is obvious from the later events, this conceptual uncertainty of symbols has continued in Russian anthem: it has soviet music but words are of liberally-bourgeois-‘patriotic’ mood. Ask any Russian student a question - which part is the strongest: music or lyrics?
· Conceptual incompetence of management shows in the fact that strictly following the norms of concept of ruling provokes many problems that cannot be solved in this particular concept of problematics, and resolution of which demands refuse of the prevailing concept and switching to an alternative one.
Obama feels the conceptual incompetence of ruling according concept to prevailing on the West in general, and in the States in particular, because in his book we can read such expression as “incurable soars of capitalistic system, which either lower effectiveness of the market, or irreparably damage the society.” (p.173 of Russian edition). However a algorithmic of the origin of conceptual incompetence of ruling is outside Obama’s understanding.
As it says in one Russian expression “some things we cannot understand not because we have weak notion, but because these things are not included in the list of notions that we have”. In this case the reason for incompetence of some honest politicians, acting on the basis of traditional law or political education is in the resolution of many critical problems of social development - in their managerial and mathematical illiteracy.
· Sufficiently universal (meaning can be used in different ways) theory of ruling, including the method of dynamic programming (not as a formal algorithm or solving one or the other problems of optimization of all processes or ruling in general), is not included in the schools syllabus.
· And in order to be able to metrologically efficiently talk about financial problems, ways and means of their solution, it is necessary to have at least notion of linearly algebra, probability theory and mathematical statistics.
In regards to the economics of the society the second requirement provides an opportunity to work with balanced models of products and financial exchange in industries and regions, and the first one provided an opportunity to build managerially-coherent balanced models and excludes a leaning towards managerially-incoherent models.
Combination of the first and the second form the necessary basis for implementation of many sincerely good-willed economic scientists’ dream: to combine in one system a planned origin, expressing economic interests of social development in general (not only needs of richest 1% of the society), and macroeconomic mechanism of market self-regulation (providing optimization of manufacturing-consumption activity on the macroeconomic level).
Actually this is one of the components of that knowledge that is objectively necessary to become a public notion in order to guarantee salvation of the USA, as well as other countries, from historically real globalization.
However, having degrees in both law and arts, Barack Obama does not posses such knowledge, primordial for execution of his, publicly announced, political mission. Chapter 5, Opportunities, of his book is a kaleidoscope of possibilities, but not a mosaic of their inter-connections in the concept of ruling, which Obama should have known. We have to point out also the fact that Barack Obama reproaches Bushes administration in the lack of ‘coherent concept of management” (p.160), although he deserves such reproach too, if not a more serious one.
Therefore a success of publicly declared political mission of Barack Obama, as a savor of the USA from historically real globalization, [success] is explained not by Obama as a person, but by the support from the owners of financial ‘know-how’, which he will include in his team, and by adequacy of those ‘know-how’ towards goals declared, including economic ones.
Without such support Obama will find himself in the same position as Gorbachev and Yeltsin, when they had nominal state power, but despite their good intentions were manipulated.
The same works for his second, global, mission - to build a worldwide socially-oriented, environmentally-friendly “capitalistic socialism with human interface”, which should make the States a wheel of progress.
Being managerially-incompetent in above mentioned sense and ruling the country on the foundations of the Bible and Constitution, the good-intentioned part of American ‘elite’ and Obama do not perceive the Bible as a source of the concept of ruling and doesn’t think whether or not this concept is a manifestation of Good or Evil. While the concept of ruling of historically real globalization is actually written in the Bible and is:
· Firstly, a doctrine of buying the whole world with all its inhabitants and their property by international Jewish usury mafia (fourth tier priority of universal instruments of ruling/weapons) and building a system of financial usury based slavery (or if you wish - usury feudalism) of humanity and destruction of those who is opposed to this project or unable to abide.
· Secondly, a faith and system of brainwashing (third tier priority) with the fact that this global political doctrine is a manifestation of Gods Will.
Without asking himself a question about differences between a human in his fullness of dignity and a highly civilized human-like, and not answering it, Obama doesn’t realize the subject of crowd-elitarism in general, in which foundation lies purposeful imposition of anti-dialectic worldview and thinking, and also - perversion of individuality by people’s religion (inc. atheism).
On the subject of religion Obama writes:
“For my mother, organized religion too often dressed up closed-mindedness in the guard of piety, cruelty and oppression in the cloak or righteousness.
This isn’t to say that she provided me with no religious instruction. In her mind, a working knowledge of the world’s great religions was a necessary part of any well-rounded education. In our household the Bible, the Koran, and the Bhagavad Gita sat on the shelf alongside books of Greek and Norse and African mythology. On Easter or Christmas Day my mother might drag me to church, just as she dragged me to the Buddhist temple, the Chinese New Year celebration, the Shinto shrine, and ancient Hawaiian burial sites. But I was made to understand that such religious samplings required no sustained commitment on my part - no introspective exertion or self-flagellation. Religion was an expression of human culture, she would explain, not is well-spring, just one of the many ways - and not necessarily the best way that man attempted to control the unknowable and understand the deeper truths about our lives.” (p. 203-204)
Having such a library of religious and cultural sort Obama was ought to notice that all scripts, pretending to be from one source, are contradicting on the same issues of both religion and society. However Obama somehow passed this by. Eventually in his religious quest Obama chose one of the evangelical churches, which leaders of freemasons have appreciated as a pass of another test of loyalty to the biblical project.
And consequently Obama doesn’t understand the specifics of American crowd-elitarism and the fullness of spectrum of its problems, provided by biblical doctrine of enslaving humanity on behalf of God, although Obama writes quite adequately about many other issues. But in this - he is a captive of the Bible and variations of historical myth of USA, and he doesn’t doubt that myth in general (second tier priority). For examples he mentions a false statement:
“ Woodrow Wilson instituted the Federal Reserve Bank, to manage the money supply and curb periodic panics in the financial markets.” (p.152)
Whereas in reality, with establishment of Federal Reserve System American statehood lost control over its financial system, delegating to private hands of representatives of trans-governmental “financial aristocracy”, by which they robbed the U.S. of a chance for more independent development, and let it sink into situation when whole population is held hostage by usury and financial speculations.
Although Barack Obama write something somewhat adequate concerning priority of universal instruments of ruling, he still does not possess dialectic as a method of cognition and creativity to the extent that would let him out of captivity of inadequate historical myth, under which reign lives the USA (as well as other countries where Bible is a foundation of culture) and biblical project of in-slavering humanity on behalf of God.