Библиотека первоисточников · исследовательский корпус первичных текстов

2. «Obama» - a project of global deceit 2.1. Why Obama and not someone else? - Some aspects 2.1.1. Aspect of internal politics

“About the current moment” №11(83), November 2008. Bureaucratic despair in Russia and global project “Obama” · перевод (English) · раздел 4 из 13

Перевод исходного произведения; точность перевода оценивается отдельно.

2. «Obama» - a project of global deceit 2.1. Why Obama and not someone else? - Some aspects 2.1.1. Aspect of internal politics

One of the key factors of existence and development of every society is its psychological spirit or dominant - optimistic or pessimistic one. If pessimistic spirit prevails in a society for long period of time or several generations then this society will face not only problems in its development but also the issue of its survival in general.

If we were to compare Russian and American societies using this factor then the result will not be in favor of Russia:

· American society is in many ways dynamic because it is optimistic. Ask any American how he/she is doing and almost every one will respond “fine/great/terrific”. And even if his/her life is very far from perfect or even disastrous he/she will stick to the norms of society and would never off-load his/her pessimism on the collective subconscious. Russians are completely different case

· Ask anyone living in Russia how he is doing and his answer will vary from total pessimism- “worse then ever”- to very careful optimism - “well, nothing special, trying to survive”. And in this age of reform Russian mass media set the ton for pessimistic dominant. E.g. when Masha Gaidar, a host of “Echo of Moscow” radio show “Special opinion” on November 11 2008 asked her guest, well known publicist and humorist Victor Shenderovitch the following question: “How do you view our future during this financial crisis” he immediately responded “I don’t see anything good”.

Here the matter is not in introducing moral bans on “crying on the shoulder” of someone who can help or at least console the “crier”, but in the fact that one should not complain about his/her life, outpouring pessimism and therefore spoiling algorithmic of collective unconscious. And in relation to this cultural norms of USA are more socially safe.

All precedent presidents before Obama - were not just random people, meaning that all of them come from “elite” clans, and some of them (according to press) are heirs of Merovingians, just like Western European monarchs and therefore go way back in their genealogy to David and as it is perceived - directly to Jesus Christ.

And pre-election of B. Obama poses a question: What could have happened to force American establishment to deviate from “pedigree” rule, at least as it seems?

In the United Stated, as in Russia, not all of the citizens participate in the elections, including the president. Those who ignore procedures of American pseudo-democracy are people who feel that independently of who will win the election - republicans or democrats - their life will not change to the better.

In 8 years of republican governance the amount of those people (mostly afro-Americans and Latino Americans) have risen significantly. And in general in past 2-3 years usual American optimism in many layers of society has started to change into such a strange feeling to “middle-class American” - pessimism. This must have caught attention of those who really rule the USA and caused the appearance of “successful African American” - B. Obama.