3. Russia’s main problem
“About the current moment” №8(80), August 2008. Signs of Boundary Between Epochs · перевод (English) · раздел 6 из 7
Перевод исходного произведения; точность перевода оценивается отдельно.
3. Russia’s main problem
However, in the history of centuries-old battle for development of originality of multinational Rus’ Civilization military-politic victory over USA at South Ossetia on August 2008 as to its importance and long-term consequences is just one of many “local importance” fights. And itself it is not rather important, if the basis of Russia ' policy has no global strategy of victory and equally no own conception of globalization.
In particular, there wasn’t qualitative military-technical superiority over Georgian party during military actions at South Ossetia.
This is straight consequence of that social-economic policy, leaded by Boris Yeltsin’s regime during all 1990-s, resulted in degradation of military-industrial complex (MIC) schools and design offices. And it is necessary to rise them up from almost nought.
But this is only upper layer of military-technical character problems. Deeper layer problems are that Russian MIC fell into stagnation before the beginning of Perestroika. As a result, many models of military weapons and equipment, with low level of unification and standardization and not defined purpose according to military actions tactics and strategy, were designed and adopted. Besides that, Russian MIC lost arms race against USA and NATO by many military equipment characteristic parameters.
But there are also consequences of even deeper layer of problems: of moral-worldview character. They resulted in non-adequateness of world-understanding and of management, organizational, technological, scientific, technical and all other decisions on society life worked out on base of wrong world-understanding.
The Soviet MIC at Stalin times developed to correct direction, but before 1970-s beginning it deviated in its development to bureaucratism, dynasty careerism, and in technical sphere - unsystematic imitation and non-system “asymmetric” answers to potential enemy.
Society can’t conceal information of instant strategic significance: it imprints on all production, - though not everyone can read it (it is necessary to see the worked with its completeness and integrity and to select indeed significant facts).
Russia’s main problem is that everything from the very beginning must be done in the best way, everywhere in common to all global significance strategy according to full function of management - not under governor’s indications, but under initiative by provinces.
All this demands for domination of different moral, different ethics, different culture of personal psychic activity in society.
While lacking these, after failure of certain operations against Russia its enemies may just “procrastinate” undertaking some demonstrations of power - real or illusive. As answer to these demonstrations RusZion ruling “elite” by its unsystematic copying of foreign elaborations and by fussy unsystematic “asymmetric” answers (not laying in channel of any global-politic strategy) would turn by itself Russia’s past victories and preconditions to new victories into Russia’s future defeats.
And “tough patriots” (which have not cultivated global-strategic situation perception and global-strategic thinking) aren’t able to withstand to strategically appointed and disciplined in strategy channel West and its periphery (even such petty as Saakashvili’s regime).