* *
The Last Gambit · перевод (English) · раздел 16 из 17
Перевод исходного произведения; точность перевода оценивается отдельно.
* *
Having read the note twice, I was astonished by dense packing of information in it. Materials of the note put the light on the problems of ancient Egypt administration, which I encountered dealing with “picnics”; and it is besides our interrelations with Holmes, which we never discussed with him. But moreover, the note talked about many other problems of western civilization: what is “democratic elections” and why democracy, under the form existing in the society, isn’t effective; special look on the nature of “copyright” and etc. I thought that discussions about this note could bring up new culture of interrelations between people, as well as between person and society. I understood also, that this note was a part of another, larger work, and that it was worth discussing with Holmes. The rest of time before dinner I was reading the file “The Last Gambit”, comparing what I was reading with the last pictures from different issues of “Chas Pick”, “Trud” and “Arguments and Facts”. The most astonishing thing was not even the celebrity of Russian “picnics” all over the world, but the unusual interpretation of events, concerning with them, by different people in different countries. After Holmes’s notes I saw the world huge and diverse, but more united and integrated, than earlier. Also I was amazed by certain synchronous course of our investigations and by feeling something invisible, but undoubtedly existing, predetermining this activity, which was called “matrix” already. New image of Russia appeared, not only as enigmatic and unpredictable country, which we, western people, became used to, but as special civilization, differing from West and East, where the sources of new millennium culture could be found.
Turning on 5 a.m. news, I got to know about the night terrorist act in Madrid, on the October 12. According to Holmes’s notes, yet on the October 3 Paolo Riego and Andrei Verov discussed in El Escorial the possibility of another act of terrorism, analysing that strange map of Spanish capital with wrench on it. I wondered if Holmes knew about the last events. I knocked at the door of his study.
– Come in, Watson, I don’t sleep. I’m studying your recordings thoroughly. I’m interested especially in your conversation with Galba in the bar of “Woldorf”. I have no doubts, that you have met real contemporary Trotskyite.
– Holmes, have you heard the last news?
– Another plane falling in New York?
– No, according to the picture with someone feeding birds on the shore of the black Sea, it will follow later. It was reported few minutes ago about night explosion on the central square of Madrid. I was just studying the copy of strange map with a hand-shaped wrench and reading you comments to it. What does it mean? It can’t be true.
– You see now, Watson, fellow, - it can. This is matrix, and matrix is everywhere! Don’t worry. I felt the same, as you feel now, on the October 4, the day after that, when we with Andrew Verov and Paolo Riego were discussing the calendars for 1994 in El Escorial. As you understood from my recordings, the flat-owner gave the most precious forecast of the day of Russian liner collapse, though he saw these maps for the first time, as well as I. And what concerns loud words about new planes falling in New York - be careful, dear Watson, if you don’t really want them to fall down. Words can be overpowering matrixes, if those matrixes appear to be enclosed to the matrixes, which an orator works on. Tomorrow well talk about matrixes more thoroughly, while solving the riddles of Russian “rebuses”. I think we have enough material for making the decision of every “picnic”. And how did you like, Watson, the note “About tandem principle of activity”?
– The strangest thing, Holmes, is that I thought about principles of our joint activity for the fist time on the day of your departure to Switzerland. Never before we have raised these questions, but after I’ve read the note, I felt that I was a rider who turned the pedals idly.
– Don’t go in for self-humiliation, dear Watson. Each of us does that part of work, which he is more predisposed to. Your approach to “picnics” analysis is rather peculiar. But what concerns the results of tandem activity they don’t belong to any of two partners privately. And such conclusion is rather new for me and, may be not unacceptable, but requiring new comprehension, beyond frequent stereotypes of our culture. Frankly speaking, I have nothing essential to contradict to the conception of “copyright” of the note. Now only one thing is clear: such ideas couldn’t arise in the body of western establishment and consequently we deal with law conscience of new culture. But, excuse me, Watson, I’d like to read your analysis to the end, and then, tomorrow, we will discuss thoroughly both variants, and, as it seems to me, we’ll come to new level of tandem activity.
Tomorrow, after the breakfast, we met in Holmes’s study. He has put on the table three “picnics” in chronological order, calendars from “Chas Pick” and copies of some other papers, which were dealt with “picnics”. And I took the book with A.S. Pushkin’s stories with me.
– What’s that with you, Watson?
– Before we start the discussing Russian “picnics”, I’d like to read you one extract from Pushkin: “Two fixed ideas can no more exist together in the moral world than two bodies can occupy one and the same place in the physical world”.
– “The Queen of Spades”?
– You’re absolutely right, Holmes, this is the beginning of the sixth chapter. While studying the analytical note about the film “Matrix”, and also after I’ve read your notes I began to have a picture in my mind of global opposition of two administrative conceptions: biblical and alternative to it - Conception of Social Security. And it seemed to me, that Pushkin in this phrase yet in the beginning of the 19th century expressed very preciously this opposition. And if in this phrase Pushkin paid his attention to informational and material components of the conceptions, then his story in the whole is devoted to its measure component. And therefore - when speaking about matrix-scenarios of the “picnics”, we can found everywhere the traces of “Queen of Spades” numerical measure. And by the way, the numerical measure of queen of spades by Tarot is 51. It’s enough to have one look on calendars in “Chas Pick” №51 (200), on 29.12.93, and №1 (201), on 5.01.94, and the numerical measure of “queen of spades” can be found at once there.
– I agree, Watson, though in the paper of 1993 this numerical measure is expressed in its number itself, and on the paper of 1994 it is in the date, if omit “ 0” between the day and the month. Once I’ve noticed the numerical measure of “picnics” and its similarity to the numerical measure of “Queen of Spades” too. And when in 1995 I encountered with the book “Esoteric tradition in Russian romantic literature” by Lorain Leiton, Illinois University professor, I decided that it will help me in revealing the secret of Russian “picnics”, because more than the half of this book was devoted to numerology [109] of this amazing Pushkin’s story. But nothing of the kind, I’ve found nothing in this book, besides some general speculations about the relations between literature and esoteric doctrines and Cabbala researches. Moreover, I had an impression, that Pushkin in his “queen of Spades” poked fun at his contemporaries-masons infatuation with mystics of Caliostro, Saint-Germain and Svedenborg. Even the biographer of my great-grandfather, Arthur Conan Doyle, didn’t pass these fascinations and became engrossed in spiritualism in the end of his life. So, Watson, in order not to return to the “Queen of Spades” during the analysis of “picnics”, let us distinguish the numerical measure of two conceptions, which appeared indeed in the sixth chapter of the story.
Holmes took a sheet of paper and drew the following table on it:
???? The “faro” game Hermann - the symbol of biblical conception Tchekalinsky - the symbol of COBa
???? The first phase of the game - the “Historical Picnic” To the left - 3 To the right - 9
???? The second phase of the game - the “Defence Picnic” To the left - 7 To the right - jack (2)
???? The third phase of the game - the “Post Historical Picnic” To the left - ace (11), but instead of the ace Hermann [110] had the “queen of spades”, i.e. - 3 To the right - queen (3)
???? Summary: 13 14
– Well, Watson, let’s follow the game of “faro”, as it’s described in Pushkin’s story. There are some circumstances, by which we can determine that matrix formed by Pushkin through the symbols of “Queen of spades” is embraces the matrix-scenarios of the “picnics”. On the first day of the game Hermann somehow staked 47000. Tchekalinsky notices: “nobody here has ever staked more than two hundred and seventy five roubles at once”. In other words, Tchekalinsky predicts the numerical measure of winnings, but Hermann is oriented towards.
– And how does it deal with the “Historical Picnic”?
– Let’s have a glance at the first “picnic”, Watson. I’ve read your recordings about your conversation with Galba, where you slaved over the question: “Does he know about “picnics” or not?” No, Galba knew nothing about “picnics” and simply was telling you about August putsch, which was developing in the framework of the “Historical Picnic” matrix. The matrix has ripened, i.e. filled with information and energy, much earlier, and the artist, who has created this rebus from five pictures, has played the function of printer, subjecting to computer, where, in the informational base, the matrix of the first “picnic” already existed. Why did Natalya Chaplina, the chief-editor of “Chas Pick”, give the copy of matrix of the “Historical Picnic in a Name of Artemis” in her newspaper №25 (70) on 24.06.91? - This is another question. Masons all over the world are well informed, that on June 24, 1717 the blue, or John’s, Masonry was legalized, and Chaplina might have done it, subjecting to mason’s discipline, to notify all other masons about the existing plan-script of USSR destroying. By the moment I’ve only learnt, that she, an editor of provincial and, frankly speaking, tabloid paper, was sitting to the left of Gorbachev - the last president of USSR, on the conference of central papers editors of former USSR, on September 17, 1991, one month after the August putsch. The conference was broadcasted by Central television, and she was allowed to be the first who asked questions to Gorbachev - the last USSR president and the last General Secretary of CC CPSU.
– Did she know anything about the?
– I doubt it strongly, as well as I doubt the capacity of editorial staff members to organize the material of news-paper such way, that it has on its backside the repertoire of six films, which you, Watson, underlined in your investigation.
– And then, Holmes, how could those films appear on that very place and give so sharp names to every of five days of the putsch?
– All these, Watson, are matrix manifestations, in the framework of which everyone, who was evolved in putsch, acted then, to this or that extent. In this sense the action s of Chapli-na is also the result of matrix manifestations of the “Queen of Spades” matrix, enclosing the “picnics”, because in the first chapter of the story someone mentions about someone named Chapli-tsky, whom the Countess gave the secret of three cards, obviously taking pity on him. But Chaplitsky, unlike Hermann, as I remember, staked not 47000, but 50000 and won three times in a row; he has got 400000 in total, paid his debt of 300000 and so won 100000 at last.
– Thus, did Pushkin show what the conception of Hermann’s game “matrix” lacked, by the numerical measure?
– You’re right, Watson! 50 - 47 = 3. This is what was called “the trinity of matter, information and measure” in the conception, alternative to biblical. And a little I can add to the story of Galba, who put the “stones” of the first “picnic” in such chronological order, that “treacherous nobody” managed to put the statue of Zeus-Eltsin on the top of power pyramid. However, this doll-statue too in its activity couldn’t go beyond the bounds of Pushkin’s matrix, expressed in certain symbols of “queen of Spades”.
Holmes took the volume with Pushkin’s stories from the table, opened it on the page he needed and started reading:
“He was a man of about sixty years of age, of a very dignified appearance; his head was covered with silvery-white hair; his full, florid countenance expressed good nature; and his eyes twinkled with a perpetual smile”.
– Don’t you think, Watson, that this portrait of Tchekalinsky, given by Pushkin in the beginning of sixth chapter, resembles Eltsin very much, as he was shown to West few years after the putsch? And now - there’s this place in the beginning of sixth chapter: “Tchekalinsky began to deal; his hands trembled. On the right a queen turned up, and on the left an ace”. Whom does this description resemble you, Watson?
– The head of GKChP, vice-president of USSR, Janaev, during his speech on TV.
– Correct, Watson. And it means that Pushkin’s matrix embraces the actions of Eltsin, as well as quasi-opposite to him GKChP. There’s nothing astonishing in it: they all belong to one and the same administrative “elite”, which was called by the abbreviation CC CPSU, which is deciphered (as I was told in Spain recently) as - Central Committee of Capitulating Party of Self-liquidation of Socialism (The words “Union” and “Socialism” both start with “C” in Russian). And Galba was right: their “masters of puppets”, if not they themselves, simply agreed, who would rule in new conditions, and who, after short time in prison, would retire properly; and the last previously have provided themselves with the halo of “strugglers for people’s happiness”, and their “masters of puppets” were supported by the possibility to return legitimately to the script of “socialistic” politics in future. Don’t you agree that if after Eltsin’s victory the lawyers proved the illegality of GKChP then if it’s needed the other lawyers will prove as strictly the fact of state treason of Gorbachev and his followers, and accordingly - the legality and competency of GKChP, whose only fault lies in their un-success. And after we have learnt everything about the conceptual power, we can say, that any legislature is a border of defence, where one conception defends itself from realizing the other conception, incompatible with the first, within the same society. But in conceptually undefined society, as the USSR was during the last years of its life, the contradictory conceptions meet in the same legislature. That’s why on its base, when conceptually defining in addition, one can perfectly prove the accusation of Gorbachev, as well as of GKChP, as well as of Eltsin and the command of reformers of the epoch “Gaidar - Chernomyrdin”. But, frankly speaking, we should be humbler, and remember, that we’re speaking about it basing only on the fact that Russia starts defining itself conceptually, and this is a globally important phenomenon.
– And what about the coincidence of numerical measures of the “Historical Picnic” and “The Queen of Spades”?
– Oh! As much as you like, Watson. It’s enough to look at the number of order of this newspaper - № 9113. And in addition, Watson, five pictures of the “Historical Picnic” contain 9 palms.
– But still I can’t understand, Holmes, what these pictures were published for? Even now, ten years later, their sense is not clear enough, and, I think, then, two months before the putsch, nobody comprehended them.
– Dear Watson, I’ve told already, that the “picnic” pictures are the embodied manifestation of the matrix, which has been formed by that time and in the stream of which the following Russian events went. Accordingly, if some event took place in the reality, it means, that in fact it has happened earlier in measure - matrix - component of Life at that moment, when the corresponding matrix-scenario of aggregorial algorithm was formed as the result of people’s psychical activity, and then it lead to this event in the reality.
If some event is not predetermined by God as inevitable, it can be prevented by two ways: the matrix can be split up to incompatible fragments and abandoned energetically, or it can be transformed in such way, that the results of realizing of the matrix-scenario would be acceptable, or better - desirable. After matrix has been formed, and till the moment of appearing of some events according to it, some time takes place, during which the matrix-scenario is filling energetically, and the participants are evolved in it, and it is synchronized with enclosing and just existing matrix-scenarios and so on. During this time the matrix-scenario and processes of realizing its characteristic events can be influenced and subjected by morally conditioned advisability.
– Excuse me, Holmes, but there’s nothing if the kind in your notes.
– In my notes, Watson, there’s only what I understood at the moment of comprehension of what I have been told. But after the conversations in different countries so many new events, and I had time to think them over and to compare them with my ideas about them. And in that case something was proved by life itself, and something required critical approach and new comprehension. What about “picnic” pictures, to my mind, they played a role of synchronizers of unconscious psychical activity of many participants of those events. The density of information packing within symbols and images much exceeds the density of lexicon information; the circulation of news-paper is several thousands copies; the readers of the news-paper looked through it automatically, and the “picnic” pictures imprinted in the unconscious part of their psyche. Any images, when coming to the light from the unconscious levels of psyche to conscious level, need the adequate lexicon, as you, Watson, need it from me now, for transforming into the concept, joining with the word and this way gaining the sense loading. People walk, drive through the city, they see movie bills, and some of films names can be suitable, for example, to some pictures of the “Historical Picnic”. Happens something like locking of the informative (image) component of trinity on its measure (lexical) component, and as a result people do “unmotivated acts” (as psychologists call that), but in fact they are motivated in the matrix of probable events, which may be filled energetically by them themselves. That’s approximately how I see the events of August of 1991. And, at that, Watson, notice - in the first “picnic” there’s more pictures (Ancient Egypt symbols plus USSR symbols) than text, but in the “Defence Picnic”, on the contrary, lexicon takes much greater part, and there’s minimum of symbols-pictures and them all belong to USSR epoch. The number of movies corresponds to the number of October putsch days in 1993. And here your acquainted Galba has revealed the matrix-scenario of the second “picnic” in the main. He hasn’t only commented the picture in the left corner of the “picnic”, where to the left of the cannon there are the words “behind the bump” and then, to the left of it, the explosion is drawn. This rebus in whole may be read as “There will be explosion behind the bump”. In the lexicon of common Soviet people “behind the bump” means “abroad”. In other words, the algorithm of New York “black Tuesday”, on matrix level, is expressed in the second “picnic”; New York can be considered the greatest “behind-the-bump” symbol. And we all are extremely lucky, that this picture hasn’t been realized in full measure: it represents the “mushroom” of nuclear blast, and, as it’s known, one of the planes hasn’t reached the atomic station in Pennsylvania. And moreover: Galba said, that putsch has gone the wrong way, and cited the words of the Unknown” from Lermontov’s “Masquerade” to illustrate his idea.
Holmes rummaged through his papers on the table, found what he needed and continued.
– Why did Galba cite these very words, when there is such place on Lermontov’s drama that is more close to the situation in Russia in October of 1993?
Holmes took the sheet of paper and read: “I had to say you yesterday, that our picnic has been shattered”. The count says it in the second act, and in the final scene he declares essentially, that “The Queen of Spades” matrix embraces the “Defence Picnic” too: “He keeps in silence, doesn’t hear me, or may be he has gone mad”. And it doesn’t matter that these words are addressed to Arbenin, they can be equally corresponded to Hermann from “The Queen of Spades”.
Holmes took the list of 13 films on the back side of the “Defence Picnic” from his table, handed it to Watson and asked him:
– What’s the title of the last, thirteenth film from the list, Watson?
– “Business Woman”.
– Well, Watson, going in for investigation of “picnics” enigma, once I had to learn the symbolic of Tarot cards. According to this symbolic, “queen of spades is active, business woman, widow or independently acting woman.” In other words, the “Queen of Spades” matrix embraces the matrix-scenario of the second “picnic”. Finally, in the “Defence Picnic” there mentioned the speech of Peter I before the Poltava battle. What do you think, Watson, about this speech?
– Nothing at all, Holmes, because I have never read the poem “ Poltava ”.
– Neither have I, but I had to get acquainted with its translation and learnt, that Peter’s [111] speech before the battle with Swedes was as brief as possible: “Go, and God with us!” - Just a few words, but they are extremely important for understanding the principle of matrix managing. I noticed that you, Watson, distinguished the utmost matrix of God’s Predetermination in the notion of mutual enclosed of matrixes, when you were reading the analytical note about the film “Matrix”. As you have seen for yourself, there are a lot of indications on mutual enclosing of matrixes in the “picnics”, and one of these matrixes lead to the catastrophe in New York and Washington. These matrixes got different lexical definitions in different times; it means, that everyone, who encountered them, called them according to the comprehension of general current of events and objective morality characteristic to him: Galba in his own way, Lermontov and Pushkin in other ways, but for them all, and for you and me too, every matrix is embraced by the matrix of God’s Predetermination, or God’s Providence, as Russians say. But why do I tell you about it, you have learnt it for yourself through the text of the “Marshal’s Song”, where all the mentioned cities - Santiago, Syracuse [112], Pisa, Toulouse - informatively cross this way or that in matrix-scenarios of all three “picnics”.
Notice, Watson, that the “Defence Picnic” appeared in the newspaper two weeks before the August putsch of 1991, and two years before the October putsch of 1993. How do you think, what can happen on matrix level during these two weeks, if the correlation of image and lexical components has been changed in favour of the latter?
– I thought about it too, Holmes, and came to the conclusion, that the matrix of catastrophes, which was perfectly described by the count on the villa “Askania-Nova”, started transforming intensively, and those who felt it and didn’t like it, reacted on these matrix changes by using lexicon, i.e., roughly speaking, tried to rape it. But they had no power over it any more.
– Watson, all what you have said is correct, but still: why does the matrix of catastrophes started transforming in that exactly period of time?
– This I don’t know, Holmes. I can only guess that in this period exactly something very important happened in the informational state of Russia.
– You’re right, Watson. And in our further investigation we will go by the second, chronological priority. This very period, approximately in May-June of 1991, in former USSR, the handwriting of the conception, alternative to the biblical administrative conception, has been finished. As I knew from people I met in Spain and Egypt, then The Conception of Social Security hadn’t its contemporary title “Dead Water”, and in its name there was something recommendation-like: “How you should reorganize Bnai-Brit”, appealed to their opponents, ruling the world by biblical conception. Obviously, the collective of authors, giving such a name, hoped to solve the conceptual crisis without catastrophes and tried to speak with leaders of biblical conception in their terminology. The name was originally made by the analogy with Lenin’s work “How you should reorganize Rabkrin”, but however their opponents considered that the developers of new conception were still under the rule of Marxism-Trotskyism. That’s why the orientation of the “Defence Picnic” is Trotskyite, and there’s much lexicon in it, because the inspirers of the “Defence Picnic” were not sure, that their symbols would work properly on the unconscious psychical levels and gave the explanations to them in definite lexicon according to their understanding of goals of country development.
– And still, Holmes, I can’t understand, what reasons do you have to speak about their uncertainty?
– Well, they are not fools, and understood, that the Conception of Social Security has only the Trotskyite-Leninist name, but anti-Trotskyite content. In other words, the representatives of biblical znakharstvo decided to use this new conception in their own interests, and this lead to their personal conceptual uncertainty, but among mutually enclosed matrixes only that matrix gets the support from Above which is more corresponds to the matrix of God’s Predetermination. Only after that I understood, why did the “Post Historical Picnic” appeared on August 17, 1992 in the newspaper “Chas Pick” №33 (130).
– I wonder, Holmes, why did the third “picnic” appear a year later really?
– I knew from Andrei Verov in Spain, that it was the time, when the first edition of Conception of Social Security has been prepared, and after long discussions the collective of authors decided to give it Russian epic name of “Dead Water” by one of postscript phrases in almost nameless work. Perhaps, it was their involuntary reaction on anticipating lexicon of the “Defence Picnic”; the third part in it is devoted to the fairy-tale “Three sons”, borrowed from the magazine “Ogonyek” of 1940. I think that it wasn’t easy for the authors of CPS to dare to give their conception such frightening (for many people) name - “Dead Water”. It would be simpler to call it “Live Water”, but it was right what the representatives of biblical znakharstvo persuaded them to do in the “Defence Picnic”. I hope, Watson, you have paid proper attention to my recordings of conversations on this theme in Spain?
– Yes, Holmes, I’ve read this place several times and with special attention, and the name of the conception became clearer for me. Indeed, there’s no mentioning of “dead water” in the fairy-tale “Three sons”, but it’s said about the youngest brother that he was “cut”. That means, that the “brothers” brought stumps back to life, and if to say about the situation in USSR after the August putsch, then Russia after the December of 1991 can be considered the “cut youngest brother”.
– That was what the West wanted to see in Russia after 1993. But the collective of authors were supported powerfully by matrix of Pushkin himself, when they were choosing the name of their conception. Pushkin continued in 19th century Russian national tradition of life-speaking.
Holmes took again the paper with his recordings from the table and read to Watson the following:
“You will get my “Sovremennik”; I wish it would deserve your approval. Let you be my contributor definitely. (…) Your poems are live water, ours are dead water; we doused “Sovremennik” with it; now you sprinkle it with your ebullient drops”.
– How do you think, Watson, who could have written it and to whom he could address?
– According to the title of the magazine it was Pushkin, and he addressed to one of his contemporaries and poets.
– Yes, Watson, you’re right; it is an extract from Pushkin’s letter of 1834 to Russian poet Nikolai Mikhailovich Yazykov, with a request to take part in the work of “Sovremennik” magazine. What is the most important for us here is Pushkin’s assessment of his poems and his creative work in whole - “dead water”. Why? The answer is - because Pushkin assembled in “Sovremennik” all creative potential of Russia. And notice the sequence: dousing with dead water goes first, and only after that the effect of live water is suggested. And I’ve got to know, that in Russian fairy-tales it’s frequent situation: single live water can’t be used, only after the effect of dead water. But single dead water can be used - for some evil spirits, for making them weaker and destroying at last.
It seems like the Conception of Social Securitytoo assembles the creative potential of peoples for leading not only Russia but also even global civilization in whole out of the crisis. Therefore the epic name of the conception - “Dead Water” - was predetermined long time before Pushkin has wrote it, and, consequently, the “faro” game was lost by biblical znakharstvo before they had started playing it on the matrix level with Internal Predictor of the USSR in the “Historical Picnic”. Even the appeal to the authority of their “alma mater” - ancient Egypt - hasn’t helped them. They tried to break the matrix of alternative conception in the “Post Historical Picnic” using the same authority.
– Do you mean, Holmes, the figure of UgOMON above the Pisa Tower in the third “picnic”?
– Yes, Watson, this figure of sitting Pharaoh symbolizes the matrix links between the first and the third “picnics”, but to the right and above all these pictures there’s Eros or Cupid, in any case - the symbol of god of Love. But true God is Love indeed; and that’s why on the level of the third “picnic” symbols the representatives of biblical znakharstvo assumed (involuntary or not), that in mutual enclosing of all matrixes there is the matrix of God’s Predetermination, and that everything will happen according to it, sooner or later. And nevertheless, if to try to translate the message of Global Predictor to Internal Predictor of the USSR from the language of symbols into the language of definite lexicon, it will mean approximately the following: “What are you trying to do? Don’t you understand that you’re trying to withstand the authority of the conception, which serves the base of stable managing of the global civilization for more than 4000 years? We have Sufism, Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, Masonry and countless number of different open and secret order structures - and everything in one bottle. And what can you oppose to that? The Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling?”
– Excuse me, Holmes, for interrupting you, but I’ve heard about the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling from Galba in the bar of “Woldorf”. He spoke about it in rather irritable tone, and I didn’t ask him questions about its content. It seems to me, that you have known something very important from the conversations with Mr. Verov, which wasn’t reflected in your recordings. You’ve posed it as main argument against symbolic challenge of Global Predictor, haven’t you?
– I’ve never read, Watson, the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling, but indeed I’ve learnt several things about it from Mr. Verov. In Russian it’s called by abbreviation DOTU.
To their opinion, it appears as an answer to new informational state of society after the change of social behaviour logic. The split of the society has global character today. There’s no understanding between representatives of science and religion, and even between representatives of different applied and fundamental sciences. Russians asked themselves: why could it happen? - And they came to very simple conclusion, which seemed to lie on the surface: there’s no conceptual and terminological system uniting all separate branches of knowledge. If there were such a system, then experts in different branches of knowledge would understand each other easily. And they tried to comprehend the characteristic features of people’s behaviour when they encounter any processes touching their living in their practical activity. And these common features are - the possibility to describe any process as a process of managing and people’s striving for managing the processes important for their living and living of the mankind.
That’s why they considered conceptual and terminological system of the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling to be the most acceptable for solving any problems of the mankind: religious, social, technical and technological, biological, military, economic, personal and psychological and others.
Thus, for example, from their point of view all western economy scientific elite is a collection of idiots and swindlers, because they know nothing about the essential metrological expression of mistakes in ruling macro-economical systems, and what should be in the list of guaranteed essential goals of ruling macro-economy, being achieved metrologically. Do you agree, that every objective science starts with measurements, and all its concepts and terms accord to them? If there’s no such beginning, this is not science, but charlatanism and primordial “bewitching of elements”. And in our days it’s more often the swindling, hidden by the schools of “economy thought”.
– But, excuse me, Holmes, there’s nothing new in it, I’ve read many articles on this theme in different special editions.
– It’s true, Watson, but the question is not in theories of ruling since they are truly numerous and applied to different spheres of human activity, including economy. The matter is in the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling itself - in rendering its content such way, that nobody in any case could turn it into a dead and dreadful dogma. This task isn’t as easy as it seems for the first look, Watson, isn’t it? In other words, it was necessary to create such conceptual and terminological system in the framework of this theory, with the help of which the expert in related science could go in for any fundamental and applied science, and which could unit science and religion, if they have the same mission - to serve for the good of mankind.
– And how do you think, Holmes, have Russians succeeded in it?
– I suppose, Watson, they have, if even you and I are occupied with this theory today. And it has one important idea referred to the vector of aims and the vector of deviation of ruling reversibility and to the re-evaluation of a negative feedback to a positive one and vice versa according to the chosen vector of aims. From the worldview positions of DOTU one can understand the following. Any contradictions and conflicts in society, which are insolvable within some historically formed limited conception of the social self-ruling, are seen in another way and can be solved without conflicts within the enclosing conception of ruling that is wider and fuller.
Some possibilities of conflicts solving and overcoming are connected with the property of mutual reversing in the pair of vector of aims - vector of deviation [113]. That what is the vector of aims within one conception becomes the vector of deviation within another one, though the vector of state remains unchanged; and vice versa. And now let’s return to the third “picnic”.
– Yes, Holmes, it seems to me that we will seriously need to occupy ourselves with the questions of the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling. But now I have some questions concerning the third picnic.
– Yes, Watson, please.
– Firstly, I can’t understand the meaning of this “duckling with the guitar” to the right of Pisa tower.
– Watson, it seems to me that such way the biblical znakharstvo represents the period of idealistic atheism, which followed the period of materialistic atheism…
– And which finished with the operation of liquidation of Trotsky, devoted to materialistic atheism? - I interrupted Holmes.
– You’re right, Watson. This operation had a code name “Duck”, and I noticed it in my recordings, as I remember.
– Excuse me, Holmes, I didn’t attach significance to it, or I could link it with the symbols of the third “picnic” by myself. Also I don’t know, what the sense of the dotted line is, going from the “White House” and returning to it. But after I’ve read your recordings, I came to the conclusion that it may mean the U-turn of the matrix-scenario, Galba told me about it on October 4.
– Apparently, it’s true, Watson. And your investigation of “Antiquity vocabulary” concerning with two group sculptures - “Theseus and Minotaur” and “Murderers of a Tyrant” - completed the whole picture of the algorithm of returning of the catastrophe matrix towards its creators. The first figure composition on the background of dotted line loop can be called “Russian wrestling” (and it can be no way in “Antiquity vocabulary”). It was very popular in the beginning of 20th century and wrestlers met in circuses, as a rule. And that’s why two compositions - “Russian wrestling” and “Theseus and Minotaur” - are the symbols of two putsches in Russia - August, 1991 and October, 1993, after which in the post Soviet society really started the “Exchange of points of view”; and “Very revolutionary forces” - “Tyrant-murderers” (kamikaze-terrorists) - fall the America’s lot.
– And what can be the meaning of the loop on the map in the place of “Russian wrestling”?
– You, Watson, may row in the University eight, but you’re still far from sea affairs, and that’s why this loop says nothing to you. But I’ve been interested since my childhood in yachting, yachts and everything linked with aesthetic and romance of sailing. And I can comment this loop as following. When a sailing vessel manoeuvres, sometimes the circumstances are such, that the wearing may be dangerous in one of the phases, when the wind is blowing from the stern, because of the risk of nearly instant transfer of sails and movable part of masts and spars [114] from one board to another, which may lead to damages of yacht, to traumas and deaths of careless crewmembers. In this case for changing the course of the vessel the turn “overstag” is used instead of wearing, and in one of the phases of this turn the wind blows from the bow along the ship. In this case the whoop transfers the sails from one board to another smoothly, without the risk to hurt or kill someone of crewmembers, to damage the sails, rigging and masts and spars. Such “turn overstag”, which is made instead of wearing, got the nick on the slang of yachtsmen - “cow overstag”, because of its clumsiness and inner ill-coordination within the crew, which isn’t able to make the turn wearing.
For example, if such crew needs to make the turn to the right on 90 degrees, it will turn to the left on 270 degrees, making the “cow overstag” instead of swift wearing. When you follow the yacht race from the helicopter, you will notice, that the yacht making the “cow overstag” moves by loop-like trajectory. But if you know nothing about the fine points of yacht managing in hard weather conditions or within ill-coordinated crew, this manoeuvre will remain incomprehensible to you. Russia seems to make such “cow overstag”: the turn seemed to be “left” - perestroika, democratising; but the farther this turn goes, the more questions the supporters of “left trend” in policy have: “Russia, where are you going? - We don’t understand…”
And Russian newspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda” on the October 18, 1990, almost a year before the putsch, represent something similar in this very sense - political:
Essentially, Watson, the manoeuvre “cow overstag” is represented nearby “Russian wrestling” and is connected with the effect of “monkey’s paw”; its symbol we can see among other pictures of the “Post Historical Picnic” and you was told about it by Galba in “Woldorf” bar.
But the newspaper “Chas Pick” №21 (73) on the June 2, 1999, with the photo-collage under the article “About Harm and Use of Mythology”, that you had brought from India, has shown how the catastrophe matrix, directed against Russia originally, transformed and turned against USA. The monument of Peter I, the founder of St-Petersburg, - “Bronze Horseman” - on the background of New York sky-scrapers; St. Isaac’s Cathedral, reflected in the windows of one of them - all this symbolizes this turn of algorithmic course of matrix processes to USA.
It is very interesting to follow the connections between these collages-illustrations to the article “About Harm and Use of Mythology” with the “picnics”. Look: here, in the lowest running head of the newspaper, under the article, there’s a picture of Petersburg panorama, but on the place, where usually the dome of St. Isaac’s Cathedral is seen, there appeared towers of New York World Trading Centre:
On St-Petersburg plan in the “Post Historical Picnic” on the same place there’s a picture of “Indian militant elephant” with the signature “The place of the most important meetings”. In other words, the heirs of NSC-20/1 Directive of August 18, 1948 - have played their game to the end: he who digs a pit for others may fall himself therein.
– You’re absolutely right, Watson, all the more, that the number of the news-paper - 21 - is the “point”, several times and in different modifications appearing on the picture in the 1994 calendar, on the picture with someone feeding birds on the embankment. And serial number - 73 - shows that two stages of matrix algorithm have been completed and the third is on the threshold. It’s worth mentioning, that Hermann in “The Queen of spades” was striving to get the sum of 21, but got 13. And in addition, if to look on Petersburg map in mirror reflection, we will have the schematic map, resembling strongly the map of New York; but instead of Hudson River mouth we will have the Finnish Bay, called “Swan Lake” here somehow, and the Neva River, called “The River of Moscow”, may be analogically with famous cliche “the hand of Moscow”. By the way, New York was originally called “New Amsterdam” by its founders, Dutchmen, and St-Petersburg was called “ New Amsterdam ” too, in times of Peter the Great, because he built St-Petersburg imitating the architecture of Dutch seaside cities.
And that’s why everything happened according to catastrophe matrix, fed by biblical znakharstvo, but not with respect to Russia, but with respect to those who developed this cannibalistic USA NSC-20/1 Directive of August 18, 1948. Notice the number of the directive, Watson, it demonstrates, that its developers were limited by Pushkin’s matrix of “Queen of Spades” in their plans from the very beginning. Yes, the planes did what they were supposed to do sharply in time indicated in the third “picnic”, but they have ruined not the symbols of spiritual and secular power of Russia, but two towers of World Trading Centre - the symbol of biblical civilization. And then everything was like in Hollywood films: rescuers with helmets and respirators, piles of dust and frames of ruined buildings, resembling Pisa tower by their appearance. All this you can see on the pictures of the “Post Historical Picnic”, Watson.
– And what can mean the word “trace”, written by hand under the slogan “Very revolutionary forces”?
– You have answered this question by yourself, Watson, when you gave the assessment of New York events four days before the catastrophe - September 7 - in your notes. You have found the “ Iran trace”, which might precede the events of “black Tuesday”. Now shocked world public considers terrorist acts in New York and Washington to be ideal by organization and completing. They a priori assert that everything planned was done completely. Of course, it’s not so, and the forth plane, fallen on cornfield, can serve the proof.
It’s beyond any doubts, that there’s some difference, unknown to us, in sophisticated plan of terrorist operation, from one side, and its realization in practice, from the other side. It would be appropriate to suggest, (theist sign is the “nuclear mushroom” in the “Defence Picnic”), that the fallen (or shot down) plane was trying to achieve the nuclear object; and the declaration, prepared in advance, allegedly on behalf of “Japanese Red Army” would connect this unsuccessful terrorist act with revenge for atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, if the operation would be realized successfully. And in that case USA together with, probably, the half of the globe would now withstand the results of radioactive pollution…
There may be some more unrealised points of terrorist act, which has been planned and prepared for several years, by expert’s opinions. If these points have been realized, the world history could go another way. For understanding the essence of what had happened, it would be useful to know what hadn’t happened. And we have much to think about here, Watson.
In your notes you’ve paid your attention to coincidence of numerical measure of the date, when the Iran plane hasn’t fallen down on London, - 7, with number of passengers on its board - 430; and you suggested, that this case is an unsuccessful hijacking of the liner, which could be directed to London. Islam terrorist, or those who stood behind them, could have developed such plan indeed. Thus, for example, it’s wide known, that Algerian terrorists yet in 1994 were going to drive an aero bus down to Paris, and then only the activity of French intelligence helped to prevent this act. Also it’s known, that 6 years ago the project of hijacking of several American passenger planes in order to attack the building of CIA and other American objects of greatest importance was found in the computer of someone named Abdul Murada, arrested in Manila, who was the participant of famous terrorist act in WTC in 1993.
And now try to imagine, what could have happened if this terrorist act had taken place indeed. So, on September 7 the Iran plane is falling down, for example, on Westminster Abbey, and destroys in addition the tower-symbol of good old England - Big Ben. Even if there have been no declarations about responsibility, the terrorists would have been indicated as Iranians at once (the plane, I remind you, belonged to the company “Iran Air”). And the same time, as we’ve got to know recently, some Iranian, jailed in Germany, makes a fuss with administration of the jail, requiring making a call to the White House. He wants to warn about terrorist acts in New York and Washington. We can suggest, that he has a certain task - to make a fuss over information about a plot against USA, allegedly famous to him, and even if he speaks nothing about “Iran trace”, being an Iranian, he is “Iran trace” himself.
While our compatriots rake the piles aside and count people killed on September 7, the planned terrorist acts take place on September 11 in New York, Washington and, perhaps, in some other city of USA.
I doubt that Americans would have closed their air zone for the period between 7th and 11th of September and would have abolished all domestic flights; the real events of September11 have shown that USA considered them invulnerable and expected danger not from those sides, where they really came from. And what happens in Europe for many years, including destroying terrorist acts and military operations, not only don’t touch them, or, more exactly, didn’t touch, but they themselves never cared about that. Even in USA NSC-20/1 Directive of August 18, 1948, which I’ve mentioned already, and which describes the complex of measures in USA policy, aimed to destroy USSR from inside, they declared, that they bear no moral responsibility for calamities of Russia, if they will take place.
Notice the fact that the terrorists in one of the planes tied not green, but red ribbons around their heads (one of passengers reported about it by his mobile phone). Red colour is significant for Shiites (Iranians, as well as members of organizations under their control are Shiites), and it symbolizes the blood of martyrs Hasan and Hussein (the second and the third of Shiite imams). Frankly speaking, the same colour is important for Trotskyites too, including left in Arabian countries.
Now let’s try to imagine the reaction of USA in the case, when clear “ Iran trace” is found.
– Nothing to think about, - reacted I, - USA would inflict a crippling blow to Iran as “state-outcast”. I remember that exactly after the attacks of September 11 Iran was called the first candidate for retribution. But speaking the truth, some time later Americans started to call some other countries too.
– You’re right, Watson, but, as you understand, in the case of quick and crippling blow to Iran the world would have turned to witness the other history of humankind, and that will never happen, thanks Lord. The role of Afghanistan in this never-have-been history can be discovered, and it will differ from what we have today. Since Pakistan and Saudi Arabia together with USA were involved in creating talibs, it can’t excluded, that they would join USA at once in destroying the bases of international terrorism, because in that case their enemy - Iran - would be appointed as its source.
There may be only one reason of such attitude to Iran, after everything you’ve known about Trotskyites of every kind. Islam revolution in Iran came to such stage, that the question of its further development could be posed as following: will it come to nothing, and as a result of it Iran will resemble bourgeois-democratic Turkey? Will the Trotskyite wing win, hiding under Muslim doctrine? Or will the Iran society awake the ideals of Mohammad within itself, and will start developing, realizing them in practice?
That’s why Trotskyites, as well as bourgeois democrats, are willing to make every effort for turning this uncertain situation in their favour, misusing the fact, that few understand this in Iran itself. And that’s why USA and other Western countries protest so much against collaboration between Russia and Iran.
If Iran has become the victim of retribution action, Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, supported by Russia, would have got it too. Also it’s worth mentioning, that two days before the “terrorist act of the century” the authoritative leader of Northern Alliance, Ahmad Shah Masud, was mortally wounded, and after that “Taliban” could have been declared the only real power, able to defend stability in Afghanistan and the whole region from “ Iran terrorists”.
So, much is fallen to mention that the events of the beginning of September were not the full realization of the plan. And this might happen because of some specific features of this complex operation; the participants were uncoordinated, they knew nothing about the tasks and even about existence of other branches of the script and its executors. That means, that everyone made his own part of the work, but in this case it was impossible to make the terrorists stop, if something went wrong (for example, the “Iranian terrorist act” wasn’t committed in London), not revealing some part or the whole combination. Someone should kill Masud, someone should call to the white House, and another one should attack WTC, and so on. But the unsuccessful discovery of false “ Iran trace” has made something like alibi for Iran.
USA made a pause. It was impossible to discover two false traces (for example, one “ Iran ” and one “Bin Ladin”); and FBI has got (they couldn’t help it) real documents, proving that some other terrorists (not Iranian and not Afghan) took part in the organization of terrorist acts. These documents could have stayed unclaimed, if USA and Great Britain (and perhaps other NATO countries) have been ironing the territory of Iran instead of Afghanistan by their “tomahawks”. But it would have been World War III, and it is not here only thanks to some unknown Iranian security officer, who was vigilant and didn’t let passengers come into the pilot’s cabin. Yes, Watson, may be, sometime later the world would establish monument to him.
After little pause Holmes offered to return to the newspaper “Izvestiya”, which he picked up in Zurich airport.
– Look on the number of the newspaper “Chas Pick” with the “Post Historical Picnic”, Watson.
– The number of 1992 is 33.
– And the serial number from the beginning of newspaper’s registration?
– 130! I seem to understand, Holmes. The representatives of biblical znakharstvo were trying to appeal to the highest degrees of Mason consecration - 33, and got into the enclosing matrix of “Queen of Spades” at once, and in addition - into the Hermann’s variant, when the sum of his pips after three days of game was 13.
– Yes, Watson, they were doomed to absolute defeat on the matrix level, in spite of all cabbalistic tricks of the third “picnic”. Notice the date when the newspaper was published and remember the epilogue of “Queen of Spades” one more time.
Holmes took the sheet of paper with his notes and read: “Hermann went out of his mind, and he sits now confined in room Number 17 of the Obuhov Hospital. He never answers any questions, but he constantly mutters with unusual rapidity: “Three, seven, ace! Three, seven, queen!…”
And stil DATE @ "dd/MM/yyyy" 15/11/2011l I can’t understand, Holmes, who could select such cabbalistic numbers, that when common people encounter with this phenomenon, they feel that this…
– …is either the manifestation of incomprehensible God’s Providence, or the trace of someone’s devilishly perverted mind, - Holmes ended my phrase.
– Yes, Holmes, I’ve told such words really on the first day of our discussion about “picnics”, although then they were dealt with numerical mystics of planes-kamikaze. But know I met it once more, studying “picnics”, and I can’t say that it became more comprehensible to me.
– But, Watson, besides it, we were talking about numerical measure, which we should work on. The mystics of numbers in New York and Washington events of September11 and the mystics of numbers in “picnics” have something in common, uniting them, and it can be called the matrix numerical measure. Chronology is the numerical measure of history; in the same way matrixes have their own numerical measure, and it is much larger by informational content than chronological numerical measure. It is the matrix numerical measure that is considered and described by cabbalists and mystics as cabbalism and mysticism of numbers. But there’s no mysticism for those who understand the nature of the phenomenon. And such person, who consider matrixes as objective thing, he not only understands the role of numerical measure in nature of matrixes, but studies to use the numerical measure for practical goals.
– I would be very grateful to you, Holmes, if you gave something like practical lesson to me on the theme “Matrixes and their numerical measures”.
– Dear Watson, I has been diving such practical lesson to you from the first minutes of my returning from India, and I must say that I’ve prepared to it properly.
– What do you mean, Holmes?
– Your reaction to the Russian newspaper “Izvestiya”.
– Holmes took “Izvestiya” №175 (26013) of September 22 from the table.
– I had a look on this newspaper in my spare time; I looked through all other pictures of this 12-pages newspaper and came to the conclusion that almost all of them are connected with symbolism of the “picnics”, besides the photo of Anna Kurnikova, which resembles Aphrodite Callipyga from the third “picnic” by the foreshortening indeed. I think that texts of the articles and titles can also help us in finding the answer to the Russian rebus. Watson, but what concerns the numerical measure, you have discovered it by yourself in the coincidence of the newspaper number and number of the flight, which attacked the northern tower of WTC. But now, Watson, look at the serial number of the paper. What do you see?
– The number 13.
– Correct, Watson. And if to add to this, that the sum of numbers in 175 is 13, we will come to the conclusion, that editorial staff of this newspaper from September 22 (11 days after the catastrophe), re-translated unconsciously some reaction of biblical aggregor to the “picnic” matrix reconstruction, which you’ve noticed too. But at the same time this collective was under influence of “Queen of Spades” matrix, that part of it, which reflected Hermann’s activity. Don’t forget, that 22 is a number of hierophants. But let’s look through the titles of articles and “pictures” to them at first. For example, there’s the picture of fisherman with spinning on the third page. Watson, translate the title of the article, please.
– “Fish has become much cleverer by the championship of fishing by spinning”. I don’t quite understand, Holmes, why are interested in this article?
– Look at the third “picnic”, Watson, here’s the dead fish in the “ Swan Lake ” - the symbol of biblical conception. I think that this article is a matrix reaction to this symbol. Translate further, Watson, please.
– A little introduction in the beginning:
“Yesterday sixty bearded men sailed into the water area “Orlovskaya Volozhka [115]” in the Saratov region. All of them have only one goal: to catch as more fish as possible: pikes, roaches, perches - everything they could catch. It was the beginning of Russian Spinning Championship. Spinning-fishers consider themselves real aesthetes - they call fishermen with ordinary fishing rods “the primitives with sticks”.
Then there are author’s name and surname: Anton Elin. Should I continue?
– Yes, Watson, please.
“Cunning spinning-fishers occupied the resort hotel “Chaika [116]” - woman-administrator has been settling persons with huge rucksacks and hanks of fishing lines then. Now their rooms are piled with fly-spoon baits, voblers, terrible jerk-baits and foam-rubber mutants like squids and vibrating tails. They will spend two days, seven hours each, in their boats with piles of these devices. Gennady Filin [117], famous spinninger, is very skilled in treating with vibrating tails and voblers, but he doesn’t take part in the championship: he wasn’t invited.
– I don’t like mass hysteric fishing, - he said to “Izvestiya”, - there’s no pleasure in this case. Spinning is the most aesthetic fishing. Its charm includes your aims to large loot. The zeal appears then, and vanishes, when trifles go.
– To Filin’s opinion, nowadays fish became cleverer. The days had passed, when a fisherman with primitive “stick” with “Nevskaya” reel and fishing line-cable could catch dozen kilos of “tails”. Now fish pecks only on such perversions as jerk-baits - it is a lure looking like pike disfigured by life. Many professionals spend winters with their cutlasses, trying to deceive clever fish with hand-made baits. Filin has caught his first ruff, when he was three years old. And “went mad” since then, as he says. The mate of Chairman of association “Ros-ohot-rybolov-soyuz” [118], Alexander Clushin [119], on the contrary, can’t stand fishing - but it was he, who invented this championship. According to him, such species as pikes, breams, perches, and even pikeperches are expected in “Volozhka”. After two days of fishing all fish will be weighted and the winner will be awarded with the medal of Russian championship. There are rumours, that the last year winner, Vyacheslav Golubev [120], is not in good form now and will let other participant have his title this year”.
– Well, what can you say about this article, Watson?
– It’s rather strange, I think, Holmes, it seems to have some double sense. It’s surprisingly enough, that all fishermen’s surnames and places have bird species in their base: Eagle-owl, Brood hen, Dove, Eagle Lake, “Gull”. And the opposition between spinningers and “primitives with sticks” is not comprehensible, and neither the bait in the form of “pike disfigured by life”.
– What concerns “bird names”, you can remember, that in the third “picnic” dead fish was placed in the lake with “bird name” too - the “Swan lake”.
– And now, Watson, translate, please the title of the article to the left. Under it there’s the photo of Konchalovski, Russian cinema-director, famous in the West.
– “Konchalovski take pictures in “mad house”. And soothing lower: “Yesterday Andrei Konchalovski, the cinema-director, has called press-conference in the object of shooting the film “House of fools”. Shooting takes place in one of Moscow psychiatric clinics”.
– And commentaries to the photo?
– “Andrei Konchalovski makes the report from mad house”.
Well, Watson, everything is clear enough. Russians call mad houses “yellow houses”. There’s “Yellow house” in the third “picnic”. I was told about this object in Spain, and Galba enlightened you on this point, obviously. And now, Watson, let’s turn to the sixth page: look at this photo of Bush in Congress, and at the slogan above his head: “IN GOD WE TRUST”. Translate, please, the title of the article and what’s printed under it.
– “Boundless justice” or “Who is not with us, he is against us” - President Bush declared.” And under it there’s brief annotation to the article:
“ USA President George Bush addressed Congress with a speech, which could be ascribed to the category of annual messages “About the state of the country”. However, this time the speech concerned the state of America, as well as of the world in whole. Bush said that foreign countries had only two alternatives: “to be with America, or with terrorists. A third is not given.”
To the right there’s little note to the article:
“The original name of the future operation - “Boundless justice” - can be changed. One of reporters, accredited by Pentagon, said during the press conference of USA Defence Minister Donald Ramsfeld: some American scientists, Muslims, are against such name of the operation. The opponents insist that it doesn’t accord to the truth, because only God (or Allah) can decide such justice. “I understand, I understand” - said Ramsfeld. This is the second linguistic conflict in Washington for the last week. Before it many Muslims categorically against the expression “the crusade against terrorism”, used by Bush, and his assistants quickly swept away this epithet from President’s lexicon”.
And the caption under the photo speaks as following: “By Congressmen’s opinion, it was the best speech of President Bush during the time of his rule”.
– Watson; and what interesting does the author notice in that speech?
– Nothing special, besides two places, worth paying attention, to my mind. The first: “Speaking about talib regime, Bush used such expressions, which no American leader used since fascism times”. And the second:
“During his speech the President said about important official appointment. He initiated new post in the country, which could be called “National Safety and Defence Minister”. New member of the Cabinet should control all questions, dealing with overcoming the threats to America from the outside. This post was given to State Pennsylvania governor, energetic and popular in his country, Tom Ridge. He will coordinate the activity of 40 federal agencies, and also of according state governments. The special feature of this office is that its appointment doesn’t need the approval of Senate, and neither any special law.”
Holmes listened to me attentively and asked to translate the title of the article and the caption to the photo below.
– “Generals offered three bases to America ”, and the subtitle: “Marxists and Muslims don’t want to help “imperialists””. The caption under the picture: “Indian solders are frequent to war”.
– And is there something interesting in the text of the article, Watson?
– It seems, that nothing special: Indian government offers USA their bases for struggling against terrorists, and the leaders of Indian Muslims are against such decision of their government. I can’t find anywhere any word about Indian Marxists, if not to consider “Indian National congress” to be Marxist, and it’s against too, by the way, as well as Indian Muslims. And by the way, “Indian national congress” is discontented with educational programs in Indian schools: they say that Hinduism is not represented attractively in them. But essentially, Indian caste system is not only one of Hinduism manifestation, but, as you told, one of fascism forms. And what’s the result: according to the “Post Historical Picnic”, Russia withstood the attack of “Indian battle elephant” - very old “battle elephant” - and now it’s the turn of USA to encounter with it.
– Yes, Watson, it seems like that. May be, Galba was right, when he was speaking about international-socialism, impending to USA, and about forming of American Gestapo, which would be more powerful than Stalin’s NKVD and Hitler’s Gestapo together. According to the title “National Safety and Defence Minister”, power of new American minister exceeds that of Heinrich Himmler, who was the leader of SS and, besides that, the head of criminal police of the Reich. And the slogan “Who is not with us, he is against us!” famous in the times of Russian Revolution of 1917 is Trotskyites’ but not Bolsheviks’ slogan. It seems, that permanent revolution goes on, but in new conditions; and the subtitle of the article devoted to the reaction of different circles to Bush’s speech in Congress - “Marxists and Muslims don’t want to help to «imperialists»” - has double sense on the matrix level: from the one side, it is a sign that Trotskyism uses Islam in its own interests, and from the other side, it is a defence from probable accusation of America in stepping Trotskyism and fascism up.
– Why do you think so, Holmes?
– You see by your own, Watson, that the word “imperialists” in the subtitle goes with the quotation marks. It allows thinking that this word means the bourgeois democrats ruling USA, when shifting to the ideological sense row, where “Muslims” and “Marxists” belong. And what we have in whole - our suspicions about Trotskyism, expressed right on the day of this news-paper appearing, have had certain base under them, and the sixth page is devoted essentially to the “Defence Picnic”, if to follow the Trotskyite Galba in its interpretation. But in this case there should be a sign on this page, which would prove its connection with the second “picnic”. I have no other ideas about the “pictures”, so you, Watson, should seek for this sign in the other articles of this page independently.
I started reading the text of other three articles on the page six. Holmes began puffing his pipe and became absorbed in texts and pictures of the “Defence Picnic” one more time.
– It seems to me, I’ve found it. There’s the article by Georgy Stepanov - “Explosion, but not terrorist act”. I’ll read the brief annotation of it to you, Holmes, and you’ll see:
“Yesterday in Toulouse (South France) terrible explosion took place. An oil-chemistry plant AZF exploded; it was located in the industrial zone of 900-thousand city. 15 were killed, and 200 damaged. 50 wounded are in hard condition.”
May be also, that the article by Georgy Ilyin, “Old Acquaintance”, can be useful for us. It reports about 72-years-old Arnold Ruitel, ex-member of CC of Estonian Communistic Party, who became the second president of Estonia in post-Soviet era.
– Well, Watson, it’s enough for maintaining the matrix-level connection between sixth page and the “Defence Picnic”, where Pisa and Toulouse are mentioned in the “Song about Marshals”. And Marxists-Trotskyites in contemporary history are “old acquaintances” indeed. Thus, the next page is 7. What’s there?
– “Contemporary Stories”.
– What does it mean, Watson?
– It is the heading of the seventh page, and it is devoted to the trial as such: the vessel “Petr Vasev” rammed the passenger ship “Admiral Nakhimov” in the Black Sea on the August 31, 1986. “Admiral Nakhimov” sank in eight minutes. There were 1243 passengers on the board, 423 perished.
– What do we have on the eighth page, Watson?
– According to the headings, Holmes, nothing. But there’s something interesting on the ninth page - I mean this picture, where two are sawing someone hanged upside down. It resembles something in your notes, Holmes, doesn’t it?
Yes, Watson, there was a conversation about Isaiah-prophet, who was sawed by wooden saw by the order of Judea ruler Manasseh. The Count remembered this story by association with the day of “truncating of John the Baptist’s head”, which takes its place on September 11. So, there is a warning about the impending catastrophe, expressed in the “Post Historical Picnic”, on the 7th page on the matrix level, and on the 9th page there’s information about the very day of catastrophe. Well, Watson, everything is true. As I remember, on the 10th page we will find the proof that we are dealing with the matrix-scenario of the third “picnic”.
With these words Holmes unfolded the tenth page, and I actually saw the photo of the monkey from the third “picnic”.
– What about are the headings of the articles, connected with the photo of the monkey?
– “Chimpanzee can read”, with the subheading below - “And the skilled prestidigitator doesn’t know the secrets of his tricks”. Under the photo there’s the caption: “Let me read!”, and under it there’s very strange report in the department “Inappropriate”: “Terrorist didn’t like circus”. Should I translate it?
– Yes, Watson, please.
“63-years-old pensioner was detained in Saint-Petersburg, suspected of knowingly false call about the bomb in the building of Circus upon Fontanka. The call to police was made on September 9. Policemen surrounded the building and evacuated all visitors and performers. As the result of searches the carton box with the caption “Bomb” on its side was found. On the base of the fact of anonymous report about bomb it was brought a lawsuit on the paragraph about knowingly false report about the act of terrorism, providing for the confinement of 3 years or less.”
– And what does it mean, Holmes, to your opinion?
– Watson, don’t you remember when was the Iranian from the German jail trying to warn Washington about probable terrorist act?
It seems to me, that it happened on the September 9.
– And who is the “chief prestidigitator” today, susceptible to the effect of “monkey’s paw”, as the result of which he ceased to understand secrets of his own tricks?
– If I’m correct in understanding the meaning of “circus shapito”, then the chief prestidigitator is Global Predictor - biblical znakharstvo.
– But the most interesting thing, Watson, is this photo on the 11th page, which explains, why the “chief prestidigitator” doesn’t know and doesn’t understand his tricks. Translate, please, the text under the picture.
– “Football-players were fighting for a ball blindly: “Torpedo”-players were in white T-shirts, British were in dark.”
– Yes, Watson, light “Atonists” and dark “Amonists” seem to have been playing too much. You know from the note “About tandem principle of activity”, that 22 hierophants, having hidden in Levi’s generation, couldn’t vanish totally from matrixes of existence, and so they should mark themselves symbolically. How do you think, Watson, what can associate the activity of hierophants and football?
– The first, as well as second, are divided into two groups, 11 men in each, and the subject of their attention is a “round object”. The difference is that the hierophants were not struggling in teams for undivided possessing it, while Egypt ruling was based on the tandem principle, and each of football teams are fighting for it - in order to send it to the goal, in the gates, past the goal-keeper of the other team [121]. So, the football game symbolizes the schism in Egyptian branch of global conceptual power, doesn’t it?
– Correct, Watson, and now - look at the football ball above the heads of “blind” players. Can you see Western and Eastern hemispheres and the Atlantic Ocean between them on its surface, though in rudely stylised form? And - laugh at it or not - but there are sharply 4 football players on the photo: according to the number of the most general categories in the Amen’s set: space, time, matter, energy (or spirit). And the headings to the left and below the photograph - what does they mean?
– To the left - “Game in the wind”, and below - “Kutuzov’s glory”. What is it about, how do you think, Holmes?
Holmes took the “Defence Picnic” once more and pointed to the picture with solder in helmet and caption to it “Where does the wind blow?” and then - to the words from “The song about Marshals” - “Kutuzov’s offspring Puzo and Jago.”
– This is the sign of association of the third “picnic with the second and third days of GKChP: Pugo is the surname of USSR Domestic Minister that period of time, and Jazov was the Defence Minister in the times of GKChP. Watson, and then please let’s look at the last, twelfth page of this paper.
– It seems to return us to the first, the “Historical Picnic”, and at the same time to sum up three rebuses in whole. Look at the article in the right column, entitled “Feel the Resemblance”, by Yuri Bogomolov. I’ll read the annotation first:
“The landscape of New York after the catastrophe turned into almost emblematic picture: the cut skeleton of the building on the background of blue sky - it’s the view from the lower point. The upper foreshortening: uncoloured piles of concrete, iron and glass, and people in bright orange clothes and glittering red helmets between them. This site of fire turned into speaker’s rostrum for a moment. It happened when President Bush stood upon it and addressed to nation through his megaphone. They (President and people) were united in this historic minute. As we were some time. When Eltsin stood on the tank. People on the other side of the ocean understand everything. Crime was committed, and inevitable punishment must follow. In our country, we continue discussing”.
– Well, Watson, and what about are discussions on the other side of the ocean?
– Mainly, Holmes, they discuss a problem: “Why has it happened with America?”
– And what conclusions do they come to, Watson?
– The range of versions is alike in or country: from “ America is too greedy” to “there’s too many democracy in the world”. But the most interesting point in this discussion, called “Brain storm” by author for some reasons, is the assessment of Russian liberal views. If you don’t mind, Holmes, I will translate this paragraph wholly.
– Of course, Watson. The paper is pro-western, liberal, and self-assessments are always interesting.
“The most popular answer is - there are too many “hungry and slaves” [122]. Social inequality in the West is too obvious and class approach triumphs. And not only in left heads. Respectable liberal heads are occupied with it as well. He seems to be clever man, liberal, moreover, western-supporter, but look thoroughly - he is no more than Marxist. To the question about Chechnya he would answer that people there struggle for its national independence. Being asked about terrorism, he would say, that it is a sequence of social inequality in the world”.
– Yes, Watson, it’s really interesting conclusion about the essence of contemporary liberalism in Russia, and it coincides with Inner Predictor’s conclusions: Liberals, ruling the country today, and Marxists, opposite to them, are concealed or potential Trotskyites by their essence, though the author of the article didn’t want to call things their names. Why didn’t Galba understand that, I wonder?
– I think, Holmes, that Galba is an overt Trotskyite, though, as I understood from the conception materials, hidden and open Trotskyites are united by psychical Trotskyism.
– And what does it mean, Watson?
– COB authors introduced this term for individuals, who reject their own declarations by reticences. It corresponds to the concept of “obsession” in Christian and Islam lexicon, and Bogomolov seems to develop this idea further in the article “Something stringer, than Gorky ’s «Mother»”. He comments the reaction of Palestinian mothers on young Arabs suicide. I’d rather translate this paragraph wholly too.
– Yes, Watson, please. All the more, that, as I remember, Galba told you something about Gorky ’s novel “Mother”?
– You’re right, Holmes, so:
“There, on the screen, not so young woman was dancing and singing with children. She might be their mother. When the subject about shakhids went on, one would remember her. The kamikazes among them were not so astonishing, as she was. Her son exploded himself voluntary, and took several lives with him. She regretted nothing. Everything was all right. We have the image of mother in our literature - Nilovna. She regretted nothing too. She blessed her only son for revolutionary, risky struggle for all humankind happiness. But it’s rather hard to imagine her brightening up, when she gets to know about Pavel’s death. Her gladness in this case…
Palestinian mother brightened up, rejoiced and said that felt happy. Happy bride. Neighbours congratulated them both, rejoiced together with them over their great good luck in this life. It is something irrational, from our point of view. It wouldn’t be correct to call it inhumaneness. May be, above-humaneness? Or super-humaneness?”
– Yes, Watson, that’s the “resemblance”. We felt. Bogomolov (significant surname as such) seems to unit fascism and Trotskyism of “super humans” involuntary by this question. To tell nothing about that he has solved the rebus of the first picture in the “Historical Picnic”.
Speaking this, Holmes unfolded the first “picnic” and pointed to the branch “Nilovna” and “Zeus on the armoured car”.
– It seems to be Watson, that terrorists-kamikazes of Arabian origin- Trotskyites in Islam, were indicated in matrix-scenario of the “Historical Picnic” as early as 1991. Yes, Galba may be quoted here: “what they were fought for has been their undoing”. And at the same time I’m absolutely sure, that neither author of the article, nor editorial staff, nor “overt” Trotskyite Galba knew anything about “picnics”, though almost entire paper “Izvestiya” of September, 22 was devoted to this Russian rebus, and Galba told you everything about each of three “picnics”.
– Wait, Watson, - Watson interrupted his friend’s reasoning, - I think there is a connection with the backside of the “Historical Picnic”.
– What do you mean, Watson?
– Do you remember about six films, applied to the first “picnic”? Here, - I pointed to the left column of the twelfth page, - there is a heading “The Outrage of Naked Gods” in the department of “Tele-cinema on the week-end”, and after it - a list of six films: “The Envy of Gods”, “Naked Maja”, “The Drops of Rain on Burning Rocks”, “Escape from New York”, “Traffic” and “The Outrage”, with short annotation to each. Should I translate?
– No, Watson, you shouldn’t. Everything is clear enough. I was thinking it over for long, why first and second “picnics” have the application with films, and the third doesn’t. It appeared, but only after completing the matrix-scenario. The fellows were late… they lost their “prediction” qualification, the ability to predict on the base of foresight, didn’t they? Essentially, this film-list indicates the algorithm of the “Post Historical Picnic”, but… but only after the matrix has turned towards its masters - biblical znakharstvo. So, that’s why “The Envy of Gods” - biblical quacks are polytheists and idolaters by their essence, they pretend to enter the huge throng of Olympic gods. That’s why Eros, ancient Greek god of love, is on the “top” of the third “picnic”. But in fact, money is their “god”, and the “god” of biblical civilization created by them. And that’s why there stood a statue of a “calf”, huge and shining, like made of pure gold, as I know, between two twin-buildings of WTC. It hardly has been burnt down and turned into dust as the result of explosions and fires, the most probable thing, that it has been covered with debris or, perhaps, crushed. “Naked Maja” is associated with “Aphrodite Beautifully-rumped”; I don’t feel like commenting “The drops of rain…” for that is all they can oppose to new conception with epic Russian name of “Dead water”; the whole world was watching “Escape from New York” on the September 11 and “Traffic” is a peculiar symbol of Western civilization, securing its stability of crowd-“elitism” and leading to its “Outrage” i.e. to death.
– And still, Holmes, how do you think, is Bin Ladin involved in destroying the twin-towers on September 11 or not?
– You see, Watson, he is, but not more than Gorbachev was involved in destroying USSR. May be. It can be said, that his real fault is even less, than Gorbachev’s. But in Bin Ladin’s case, as well as in Gorbachev’s, very powerful forces stand behind their backs. Choosing the candidature for the image of enemy, these forces assess his ambitiousness. Bin Ladin appeared the most suitable for this role, in spite of all his billions, and thanks to his ambitiousness and demonic type of psychical structure. Gorbachev answers to the accusation of destroying USSR, which still sound directed against him: “How could I be so courageous to start reformations… I might have been sitting in the General Secretary’s chair still” [123]. That means the following: “Such were the objective circumstances, and Soviet Union was doomed to inevitable split by all its totalitarian past, which Gorbachev was struggling against allegedly”.
But he could have been called really courageous, if he wouldn’t have betrayed the multi-national people of USSR, even having seen the half of his head laying on the table in front of one of presidium members; he could have been called courageous, if he wouldn’t have succumbed to destroying aggregor-matrix algorithms, destroying USSR in accordance with USA NSC-20/1 Directive of August 18, 1948, but if he would have found and realized some constructive alternative.
It could have saved USA from September 11 terrorist acts: Afghanistan became the main base of vakhabits and refuge of terrorists and drug-dealers in the last ten years of 20th century only as a sequence of Gorbachev’s betraying of USSR and pro-Soviet regime of Nagibula.
In the case of Soviet Union the role of enemy was given to GKChP with trembling hands. But you must remember, Watson what Galba told you about agitation point and advertising campaign: if one agitation point of socialism is destroyed, than one agitation point of capitalism should be destroyed too, if they have decided that “we’ll our, new world will construct”. But stereotype is impossible in the deed of destroying the “agitation points” of old world, which let keep world in balance by balancing between them, because in opposite case even the crowd, thoughtlessly watching pictures on their screen, would understand everything. For destroying the agitation point of capitalism the other method is needed and nothing dealt with associative links with ancient Greek mythology, because biblical znakharstvo understood, that the trick of global circus Shapiro - “such were the objective circumstances” - wouldn’t go this time. But they needed the “friend” of White House. Watson, you know that big family of Ladins was the “friend” of White House, and the circus trick - is Osama Bin Ladin himself as “prodigal son” [124] of rich family - belongs to the sphere of mythology too. And here we encounter with Rembrandt and his striking piece “Returning of Prodigal Son” once more. Besides what count read on the villa “Askania-Nova” from the paper “Chas Pick” №151 of October, 14, 1997 in this connection, a very strange phrase I’ve found in this newspaper, which lead my reasoning to such conclusions.
Holmes took a newspaper from the table, with a photo of disfigured “Danae” and, pointing by his finger on the marked paragraph, asked to translate it.
I began translating:
“Today’s world is full of cruelty and violence. In the end of 20th century more and more works of art become the victims of maniacs. Rembrandt is the leader in a field of such crimes. His paintings attract madmen with a peculiar force”.
Listening to me, Holmes was remembering something (as he said afterwards, he remembered the conversation with count on the villa).
I finished reading the paper, and showed with all my appearance, that I was ready to listen to Holmes’s further explanations.
– Watson, haven’t you heard something about maniac’s attack on Rembrandt’s picture “Returning of prodigal son” from the press or television? - Holmes asked and not waiting for the answer he continued:
– No, Watson, don’t look for it, such things never repeat, because stereotype is impossible, when the question is about methods of matrixes realization. Algorithm of the myth about “prodigal son” hasn’t been blocked, and everything in America goes according to plan. May be, there was some plot too, as in USSR before August putsch. Look, how persistently all world TV channels make the crowd frequent to the image of the enemy, every day since September, 11 - they demonstrate the beard and blank all-forgiving look of Osama Bin Ladin. There’s no hatred or self-admiring in this look, unlike it was with Hitler or Mussolini. Doesn’t it remind you something?
– Yes, really, - I thought suddenly, - this view or foreshortening of terrorist №1, as he is demonstrated by mass media, is familiar to me somehow. Look or foreshortening? “Long-awaited foreshortening”, - I remembered the caption under Anna Kurnikova photo.
While I was remembering the “long-awaited foreshortening”, Holmes took big album of Rembrandt’s pictures from the bookshelves of his study, and opened it on the page with the reproduction of “Returning of prodigal son”. I looked at the face of blind old man, who put his arms on “prodigal son’s” shoulders, and freeze: If the blind man opened his eyes, he would be the very image of Osama Bin Ladin [125]. I’ve got chills up and down my spine.
COMMENT: Next to Rembrandt’s “Returning of Prodigal Son” piece there are photos of Osama bin Ladin. The upper photo, which rather clearly repeats the old person’s face, is the mirror image of the real photo. The lower one is the real photo.
– If there’s a myth and its material realization, than its algorithm stepping up and an energetic filling of the matrix should take place too, - Holmes uttered slowly.
– What, one more attempt on Rembrandt’s masterpiece?
– No, Watson, the psyche’s attempt to destroy the picture “Danae” is blockage of myth’s algorithm, but I speak about energetic feeding of matrix. It may be some mass show, like those, which the CC CPSU leaders organized on the days of people’s festivals, or… spectacle. Wait, Watson, I’ve read somewhere, that Dyagilev staged a ballet “Prodigal Son” on Prokofiev’s music in times of great depression of 30s. And there they said, that every famous dancer of 20th century has whenever taken part in this ballet in leading role, for this is the theatre of one actor, and every performer could declare his individuality in full measure in this ballet. So, Watson, if you hear somewhere about the staging of “Prodigal Son”, you know - it is energetic feeding of New Testament myth about “Prodigal son” by the emotions of aesthetics-liking crowd, and Bin Ladin is the signboard of this myth.
– Holmes, so what’s that… what is going on? - I muttered mostly for myself.
– Magic, Watson, it is social magic. And everything goes in a way ringleaders of the cult need it. It’s rather probable, that video-cassette with Bin Ladin, speaking about his involving it terrorist acts, would be demonstrated to the crowd, and then, when passions are too hot, the other video-cassette would be shown - with his volunteer leaving for the next world. The further is simple: to get rid of the beard and blank look, to make plastic operation on the face, and our Bin Ladin, having made the most important deed in his life by his 44, will dissolve in “new world order” and may be, will even take part in managing it.
Yes, Watson, all these pictures, films, performances are products of biblical culture and manifestations of its moral collapse, which happened accompanied with well-intended words about the role of “ten commandments”, “love to a neighbour” and so on. And the story told by Galba in the bar of “Woldorf” and the photos and texts in “Izvestiya” are the best illustration of the statement that “matrix is everywhere”. People, not knowing about that, re-translated the matrix-scenarios of three “picnics” by their live language of symbols, and they proved by doing it that matrixes belong to objective reality, the same way as our homes, food, and every-day stuffs. And matrixes should be learnt to use them for the good of human being, not for doing harm. But for understanding the essence of matrixes one should become human, that means - to exceed over animal, zombie and demonic psychical structure, but it’s not so easy, as all human history shows.
– And still, Holmes, whoever were the artists who created the “picnics” - their psychical health was in great danger, to my mind. That all is simply incredible! What’s the sense of… writing about that all… so frankly and by them themselves?
– Perfectly noticed, Watson, - answered Holmes, - I was thinking the same in the beginning. And then I understood - why not? Especially, if to take into account, that they often don’t understand what they write, because most of them are zombies or self-establishing demons by their psychical structure. What part of our compatriots is able for scrupulous, sharp logical analysis of political events during dozens of years? And do people have time to stop and think about what’s happening about them, when they are busy with every-day life problems, live in debt and under interest, muted by increasing aggressive informational flood? It’s really the game without rules, but also without risk, Watson, from the point of view of its bigwigs, who have forgotten about the limits of God’s allowance.
– But every time someone can appear, who would be able to unmask these games, to write about them, to bring them to justice! What for to hand him one more trump card?
– No sense, my friend. Such “writer” would be declared paranoid or madman and he would reach nothing, besides worries down upon his own head. Can you imagine, how many idlers and parasites on our planet earn their living by calling white - black, truth - false, good - evil, hangman - victim and so on, and they do it everywhere - on TV and radio, in the press and Internet guest books, on conferences, summits, international forums and symposiums, from the speaker’s rostrums and straight in the streets. Believe me, Watson, they do it frantically, with conviction and even artistically, in different combinations and keys, imitating different ideological trends and orientations, wherever only the danger of something fresh, pure and not vilified exists. And there’s only on reason for that: they all are masters-illusionists by birth, imitators and mystifiers and they earn their living by that, and can’t imagine another way of living, don’t want and can’t live another way unless being parasite on other people’s lives. It is colossal cultural, psychological, religious, at last, worldview problem, and some people consider that biological too. But you were going to ask me one more question, weren’t you?
– After your words, my dear friend, I don’t know, is it reasonable to ask about such trifles?
– Why, Watson, you’ve told me recently, that only knowing makes people free. I would be sincerely glad to help you as much as I can.
– In this case, Holmes, I’ll ask you to explain me the meaning of the words box cutters, because it would be rather ridiculous to think, that supposed terrorists could really be armed with such peculiar subjects.
– Bravo, my friend, you haven’t missed even this little detail! Such perfect analytical makings could make you splendid detective!
This moment there was knocking at the door, and Mrs. Hudson, our kindest hostess, appeared on the threshold. Hardly has she entered the room, she addressed a question to me:
– Aren’t you ashamed, Mister Watson, you have totally worn out our dear Holmes! Dinner will be ready soon, and you’re still sitting here, in stuff rooms, and talk, and talk without end.
– I assume my fault, Mrs. Hudson, but the theme was so absorbing, that I completely forgot about time. We discussed the terrorist attack on New York on the September 11, 2001.
– Nonsense! When you say was it? Do you remember what date is it today? Imagine, some speculators knocked down two steel bookcases and sacrificed other speculators, in order to make some profit of it: is it worth worrying so much and missing your morning promenade?
Holmes and I, we looked at each other in amazement, and then burst out laughing… this old woman was right in the main point, if not to take into account some details.
– By the way, Watson, what date is today?
– October 14, if I’m not mistaken, Holmes. We started investigating “picnics” on the 22nd of September, and today is the 22nd day of our new investigation…
– And 33rd day since September 11, - added Holmes, - but according to the day of the month, we act in the rhythms of favourable matrix of Pushkin’s “Queen of Spades”, - and after that his loud laughter sounded. - Well, Watson, pick up these two files into one, add, what you consider necessary and send the floppy disk to Russia, for Pchelovod, address is here. May be, we will be useful too for formation of new conception in the world.
And now let’s go and have a walk. Life is beautiful and it surprisingly continues!…